Madhya Pradesh

StateCommission

A/08/2816

RAMRAJ MISHRA - Complainant(s)

Versus

GRAMIN VIDYUT SAHAKARI SAMITI MYDT. AND OTHER'S - Opp.Party(s)

SH. DEEPESH JOSHI

05 Apr 2019

ORDER

M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPAL

PLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL

                              

                                    FIRST APPEAL NO. 2816 OF 2008

(Arising out of order dated 30.09.2008 passed in C.C.No.559/2007 by District Forum, Satna)

 

RAMRAJ MISHRA                                                                                               …          APPELLANT

 

Versus

                 

JUNIOR ENGINEER, GRAMIN VIDYUT SAHAKARI

SAMITI MARYADIT, M.P.POORVA KSHETRA VIDYUT

VITRAN COMPANY LIMITED & ORS.                                                               …         RESPONDENTS.

 

BEFORE:

 

                  HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHANTANU S. KEMKAR    :      PRESIDENT

                  HON’BLE DR.  MRS MONIKA MALIK                           :      MEMBER                                  

 

                                      O R D E R

05.04.2019

 

          Shri Deepesh Joshi, learned counsel for the appellant.

           Shri Ajay Dubey, learned counsel for the respondents.

 

As per Shri Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar :                       

            Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 30.09.2008 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Satna (For short ‘Forum’) in C.C.No.559/2007 whereby the Forum has dismissed the complaint, the complainant has filed this appeal.

2.                Brief facts of the case as stated by the appellant/complainant are that he had applied for an electricity connection for running flour mill under Prime Minister Employment Scheme from the opposite party/respondent M. P. Poorva Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Limited (For short ‘Electricity Company’).  It is stated that despite repeated requests electricity connection was not given and the bills were raised. The complainant therefore filed a complaint before the District Forum.

3.                The Forum dismissed the complaint holding that the electricity connection was provided to the complainant but he failed to pay any bill and only to escape from the liability of paying penal bills, he has filed this complaint.  Hence this appeal.

4.                Having heard learned counsel for parties and on perusal of record we find that the record reveals that present case is based on allegation of theft of electricity by unauthorized use of electricity. Appellant was granted electricity

-2-

connection no.5593 on 16.11.1995, thereafter on account of non-payment of bills, the said connection was temporarily disconnected.   Officers of the respondent inspected the premises of the appellant on 20.08.2007 and found the appellant was using the electricity connection illegally by connecting it through wire, whereas his electricity connection was disconnected earlier. Panchnama to that effect was prepared.  Accordingly, under Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003, penal bill was raised.  The Supreme Court in the case of U.P.Power Corporation Limited & Ors. Vs Anis Ahmad, III (2013) CPJ 1 (SC) has held that a Consumer Forum cannot derive power to adjudicate a dispute in relation to assessment made or offences under Section 126 and 135 to 140 of the Electricity Act, 2003 as acts of indulging in unauthorized use of electricity as defined under Section 126 or committing offence under Section 135 to 140 of the Electricity Act do not fall within the ambit of Consumer Protection Act. 

5.                In view of the aforesaid, in our considered view, the Forum had no jurisdiction to entertain the complaint in respect of grievance raised by the complainant.  The complaint being not maintainable before the Forum has rightly been dismissed by the Forum.

6.                As a result, we do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order.

7.                The appeal fails and is dismissed. 

 

 

              (Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar)        (Dr. Monika Malik)             

                     President                                         Member 

 

   

                                                                                                                                   

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.