Circuit Bench Nagpur

StateCommission

A/03/788

Krishnakumar S/o. late Daulat Raikwar - Complainant(s)

Versus

General Manager, Telecom - Opp.Party(s)

Yogesh Nayyar

09 Sep 2015

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCH
NAGPUR
 
First Appeal No. A/03/788
(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/04/2003 in Case No. CC/186/2002 of District Nagpur)
 
1. Krishnakumar S/o. late Daulat Raikwar
R/o.Plot No.47,Vivekanand Nagar, Behind Gajanan Mandir, Nagpur
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. General Manager, Telecom
Saraf Chamber, Mount Rd.Sadar, Nagpur
2. Asst Chief Accouts Officer,Tra Unit
Near Kasturchand Park, BSNL, Nagpur Telecom, Nagpur
Nagpur
M S
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. B.A.Shaikh PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MRS. Jayshree Yengal MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
None
 
For the Respondent:
None
 
ORDER

(Passed on 09.09.2015)

 

Per Mr B A Shaikh, Hon’ble Presiding Member

 

None is present for the appellant. Perusal of the earlier daily proceedings shows that Adv. Ms Shweta Bhavsagar holding for Adv.Mr Yogesh Nayyar had appeared before this Commission on 09.07.2015 and she had sought adjournment for depositing the earlier cost of Rs.500/- imposed on the appellant on 30.04.2015. On 09.07.2015 adjournment was granted subject to heave cost of Rs.1,000/- to be deposited in Legal Aid Account of this Commission. This adjournment till this date was granted to the appellant subject to deposit of previous cost of Rs.500/- and subsequent cost of Rs.1,000/- i.e. total cost of Rs.1,500/- in Legal Aid Account of this Commission. It appears that the said cost is not deposited as yet as above.

 

Moreover, direction was given to the appellant in presence of his representative Mr Nandanwar that the appellant shall produce two complete sets of appeal compilation to this Commission and one set for respondent’s advocate on next date without fail. Last chance was granted till 30.04.2015 for the said compliance. However, the said compliance is not made by the appellant though appeal came to be adjourned thrice i.e. on 20.04.2015, 30.04.2015 & 09.07.2015. The appellant has filed copy of the impugned order dtd.29.04.2003. No reply of the O.P. / respondent, filed before the Forum and the documents filed before the Forum by the complainant / appellant, are filed alongwith the appeal memo.  Moreover, none appeared for the appellant today also. 

 

Hence, on these grounds the appeal is dismissed in default.

No order as to costs.

Copy of this order be furnished to both parties free of cost.

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. B.A.Shaikh]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MRS. Jayshree Yengal]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.