Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/83/2020

Jyotirmoy Poul - Complainant(s)

Versus

Flipkart Internet (P)ltd - Opp.Party(s)

10 Mar 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/83/2020
( Date of Filing : 05 Mar 2020 )
 
1. Jyotirmoy Poul
Artech centre 3B2,cotton hill road,Edapazhanji,Thycadu,Trivandrum
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Flipkart Internet (P)ltd
outer Ring Road,Bengaluru,karnataka
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 10 Mar 2021
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES

REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PRESENT

 

 

SRI.  P.V. JAYARAJAN

:

PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR

:

MEMBER

SRI. VIJU  V.R.

:

MEMBER

 

                                               

C.C.No.83/2020    Filed on 12.03.2020

ORDER DATED: 10.03.2021

 

 

Complainant:

 

 

Jyotirmoy Paul, Artech Centrix 3B2, Cotton Hill Road, Edapazhinji, Thycaud P.O., Trivandrum – 695 014

 

 

(Party in person)

 

 

Opposite party:

 

                                                            

Managing Director, Flipkart Internet Private Ltd., Building Alyssa, Begonia & Clove Embassy Tech Village, Outer Ring Road, Devarabeesanahalli Village, Bangaluru – 560 103

 

 

(by Adv. Shiby P.P.)

 

 

 

ORDER

 

SRI. P.V. JAYARAJAN,  PRESIDENT:

 

  1. This is a complaint filed under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986. 
  2. The case of the complainant is that he has placed order for three numbers of “Dove Go Fresh Body Lotion” with the opposite party on 15.02.2020 and the allegation is that the opposite party has delivered wrong product to the complainant.  Further case of the complainant is that he opted for replacement of the product and the opposite party again delivered the wrong product to the complainant.   Alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of opposite party, the complainant approached this commission for redressing his grievances.  Opposite party entered appearance.  As the opposite party has not filed any version within the stipulated time the case was posted to 10.03.2021 for the chief affidavit of the complainant.  On 10.03.2021 the complainant filed a memo stating that he is not willing to proceed with the complaint as he has taken VRS from his service and leaving Trivandrum on 09.07.2021.  He also expressed his willingness to not press the present complaint.
  3. In the result the complaint is dismissed as not pressed.  No order as to cost.

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 10th day of March, 2021.

 

Sd/-

P.V. JAYARAJAN

 

:

 

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR

 

:

 

MEMBER

Sd/-

VIJU  V.R.

 

:

MEMBER

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SL

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.