Haryana

Panipat

CC/16/54

Sumit Mittal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Estate officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. R.D. Bali

22 Mar 2017

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
PANIPAT
 
Complaint Case No. CC/16/54
 
1. Sumit Mittal
Age-41 Years Son of Sh. K.P. Mittal R/O House No. 1375, Sector-6, Urban Estate, Karnal
Karnal
Haryana
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Estate officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority
(HUDA) Panipat
Panipat
Haryana
2. Haryana Urban Development Authority
Sector-5, Panchkula, through its Chief Administrator.
Panchkula
Haryana
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SUMEER SINGH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Samarjeet Singh Samran MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:Sh. R.D. Bali, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 22 Mar 2017
Final Order / Judgement

            The file taken up today on the application moved by the complainant.

2.         The learned counsel for the complainant has made a statement for withdrawal of the complaint. His statement has been recorded separately.

3.         In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for complainant, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. The parties concerned be communicated of the order and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SUMEER SINGH]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Samarjeet Singh Samran]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.