Punjab

StateCommission

RP/3/2016

Kuldip Raj Kaila - Complainant(s)

Versus

DTDC Courier - Opp.Party(s)

In Person

23 Sep 2016

ORDER

Punjab State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission
Dakshan Marg, Sector 37-A , Chandigarh
 
Revision Petition No. RP/3/2016
(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/01/2016 in Case No. 162/2015 of District Hoshiarpur)
 
1. Kuldip Raj Kaila
Kuldip Raj Kaila S/o Sh. Wadhawa Mal, R/o 196/10, kaintahan, Dasuya 144205
Hoshiarpur
Punjab
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. DTDC Courier
Rishu Niwas Adjoing Railway Line, G.T. Road, Dasuya
Hoshiapur
Punjab
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Gurcharan Singh Saran PRESIDING MEMBER
  Jasbir Singh Gill MEMBER
 
For the Petitioner:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 23 Sep 2016
Final Order / Judgement

2nd Additional Bench

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB,

DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH.

 

Revision Petition No. 03 of 2016 

 

Date of institution: 06.01.2016

 Date of Decision:  23.09.2016

 

Kuldip Raj Kaila (Senior Citizen) Aged 70, r/o 196/10, Kainthan Dasuya District Hoshiarpur (PB) 146001   

                                                                                                 ….Petitioner

Versus

 

  1. M/s D.T.D.C Couriers Rishi Niwas Adjoining Railway Line, G.T. Road Dasuya. 
  2. M/s Foreigners Regional Registration Officer o/o The FRRO Bureau of Immigration (MHA) Govt. of India, Lay Building, Ranjit Avenue Amritsar (PB)

                                                                            ....Respondents

 

     Revision Petition against order dated 17.11.2015 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Hoshiarpur.

 

Before:-

 

          Shri Gurcharan Singh Saran, Presiding Judicial Member

          Shri Jasbir Singh Gill, Member

                   

Present:-

 

For the Petitioner         :         None

 

 

                  

Gurcharan Singh Saran, Presiding Judicial Member

 

Order

 

          Despite serving the notice to the revisionist/petitioner two times, none has appeared on behalf of the revisionist/petitioner. It seems that petitioner is not interested in pursuing with the revision petition. Therefore, the revision petition is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. 

                   Copy of order along with record of the District Forum be sent to the concerned District Forum. 

 

                                                                   (Gurcharan Singh Saran)

                                                                   Presiding Judicial Member

                                                                  

 

                            

          September 23, 2016                          (Jasbir Singh Gill)             

          PK/-                                                             Member

 

 
 
[ Gurcharan Singh Saran]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[ Jasbir Singh Gill]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.