Kerala

Trissur

CC/08/119

P.K.Geevar - Complainant(s)

Versus

DTDC Courier And Cargo Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.A.D.Benny

23 Mar 2009

ORDER


CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Ayyanthole , Thrissur
consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/119

P.K.Geevar
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

DTDC Courier And Cargo Ltd
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. Padmini Sudheesh 2. Rajani P.S.

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):
1. P.K.Geevar

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. DTDC Courier And Cargo Ltd

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. Adv.A.D.Benny

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

 
By Smt. Padmini Sudheesh, President:
 
            The case of the complainant is as follows: On 13.9.07 the complainant sent a courier through the respondent to TTK Health Care Service at Bangalore. The respondent issued a receipt bearing No. Q 13725280. The courier contained insurance related documents. But till this day the respondent did not hand over the said courier to the addressee. The complainant contacted the respondent but no result. This shows deficiency in service of the respondent. So the complainant was caused to send a lawyer notice but was no reply and no remedy. Hence this complaint.
 
            2. The respondent is called absent and set exparte.
 
            3. To prove the case of the complainant, he has filed affidavit and the documents produced by him were marked as Exts. P1 to P3. 
 
            4. According to the complainant he had sent a courier through the respondent agency to TTK Health Centre at Bangalore on 13.9.07. But the respondent did not deliver the things so far. The complainant contacted the respondent many times. But there is no settlement of the claim and so this complaint has filed.
            5. There is no counter evidence to the evidence of the complainant.
 
            6. In the result, complaint is allowed and the respondent is directed to pay Rs.2500/- (Rupees two thousand and five hundred only) as compensation with cost Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred only) to the complainant within one month.  
 

            Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the open Forum, this the 23rd day of March 2009.




......................Padmini Sudheesh
......................Rajani P.S.