Bihar

Patna

CC/152/2020

Smt Kalindi Mishra,W/o Late Dayashankar Mishra & ors. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dr.Dharminder Nagar,India Head (Paras),Paras Health Care Pvt.Ltd. & others - Opp.Party(s)

Adv. Kameshwar Mishra

31 May 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM
PATNA, BIHAR
 
Complaint Case No. CC/152/2020
( Date of Filing : 16 Sep 2020 )
 
1. Smt Kalindi Mishra,W/o Late Dayashankar Mishra & ors.
444,East Mahesh Nagar,(in front of Pani Tanki,)P.S-Patliputra Colony
Patna,
Bihar,
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Dr.Dharminder Nagar,India Head (Paras),Paras Health Care Pvt.Ltd. & others
C-1,Sushant Lok,Phase-1,Gurgaon-122002
Haryana
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 JUDGES BIDHU BHUSHAN PATHAK PRESIDENT
  Mr.RAJNISH KUMAR MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 31 May 2023
Final Order / Judgement

On call, no one turned up on behalf of complainant. It is relevant to mention at the outset that this case was brought on account of Medical Negligence as stated by the complainant in the complaint that due to negligence of Opposite party his mother died. Hence, after considering the facts involve for proper appreciation, it was sent to Civil Surgeon to constitute a Medical board and to provide expert opinion relating to the points of negligence by the doctor under treatment as stated by the complainant. In compliance thereof, Civil Surgeon Patna had constituted a team of five doctors including him as a Chairman of the committee and submitted report, which bears dated 02.11.2022. Of course, after going through the report it appears that final opinion has been given which reads as follows “we opine that the Treatment and Management at Paras HMRI(the Opposite Party) were at standard norms. There is no evidence of any Professional Negligence & Deficiency in Service on part of Paras HMRI, the opposite party”.

          An opportunity to the complainant for  hearing has been given after receipt of the report of the expert but complainant perhaps after receipt of the report has become disinterested and did not turn up for any objection against report. After careful scrutiny by this District Commission, upon the expert opinion we find that the doctors who have participated in the medical board had categorically examined each and every aspect. Under the aforesaid discussion and reason, we do not think proper to issue notice against the opposite party. Hence, this complaint petition stands dismissed without its admission.

 
 
[JUDGES BIDHU BHUSHAN PATHAK]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Mr.RAJNISH KUMAR]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.