Circuit Bench Nagpur

StateCommission

A/09/564

Rushabh Honda Through its Manager - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dr.Chandrashekhar Kshamakant Gillurkar - Opp.Party(s)

Shrikant Saoji

16 Nov 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCH
NAGPUR
 
First Appeal No. A/09/564
(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/06/2008 in Case No. 652/2008 of District Nagpur)
 
1. Rushabh Honda Through its Manager
R/o 33/A,MIDC,Hingna,Nagpur
Nagpur
Maharashtra
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Dr.Chandrashekhar Kshamakant Gillurkar
R/o Plot No.20,Reshimbagh,Nagpur
Nagpur
Maharashtra
2. Bhavya Honda Through its Manager
7-Kingsway,Opposite S.B.I. Zonal Office,Nagpur
Nagpur
M.S.
3. Honda Siel Cars India Ltd.Through its Zonal Office Manager
R/o 126-T.T.C.,Industrial Area,M.I.D.C.,Shiravale Nerul Thane-Belapur Road,New Mumbai Through Manager Kingsway,Infront of S.B.I.
New Mumbai
M.S.
4. Honda Siel Cars India Ltd.Through its Manager
Plot No.A-1,Sector 40/41,Kasha Road,Industrial Area,Gautam Buddha Nagar,Surajpur(U.P.)
Surajpur
U.P.
5. H.D.F.C.,C.H.W.B.B. Through its Branch Manager
General Insurance Co.Ltd.,Civil Lines,Nagpur
Nagpur
M.S.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Jayshree Yengal PRESIDING MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 16 Nov 2016
Final Order / Judgement

(Passed on 16/11/2016)

          None for the appellant and respondent No. 5 is present. Perusal of previous proceeding reflects that appellant was directed to serve notice issued by this Commission to respondent Nos. 1 to 4 by order dated 27/01/2016. The matter is repeatedly being adjourn for compliance of the aforesaid direction. The appellant has not complied the same. The appellant was already granted last chance on 29/03/2016 to comply the direction issued by this Commission to serve notice to respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Perusal of previous proceeding also reflects that  counsel for the appellant lastly appeared in this matter on 15/10/2015. He is neither appearing in this matter nor has compiled the aforesaid direction. Therefore this appeal deserves to be dismissed for want of prosecution. Matter be kept back at the end of the board for appropriate orders.

Later on:                                            

        The appeal is recalled at the end of the board. None for the appellant is present. Hence this appeal is dismissed in default.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Jayshree Yengal]
PRESIDING MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.