Complainant filed an appeal before the State Commission in which notice was issued but inspite of notice, respondent did not appear.  The State Commission had received a letter from the Headquarter of the respondent at Raipur requesting to appoint Government Advocate to represent the respondent before the State Commission.  The State Commission appointed Mr. Santosh Pandey, Government Advocate to represent the respondent who was usually appearing before the Commission. 

-2-

The case was adjourned to 02.3.2010. 

Present revision petition has been filed challenging the order of the State Commission.

It is contended by the petitioner, who is appearing in person, that the State Commission should have proceeded against the respondent ex-parte as the respondent had not appeared inspite of service.  We do no agree with this submission.  The State Commission had received a letter from the respondent requesting it to appoint Government Advocate to represent its case and in terms of the request made by the respondent, the State Commission appointed Government Advocate to appear on behalf of the respondent, who often appeared before the State Commission in such case.  There is no infirmity in the order passed by the State Commission.  Dismissed.