Learned counsel for the petitioners present. The learned counsel for the petitioner sent the demand draft to the respondent alongwith an application which unfortunately does not mention the date of hearing. A.D. card received from respondent No. 2. Everybody has got the same address. They should have appeared before the Commission. They have not turned up and they are proceeded ex parte. Arguments on merits heard. The case of the petitioners was dismissed by the State Commission vide the following order:- “27.8.2012 FA-237/09 Present: None for the Appellant None for Respondent. 1. None appeared on behalf of both the parties despite repeated calls in the first and second call. 2. Call again at 12.30 p.m. (V. K. Gupta) Member (Judicial) The case is called out at 12.30 p.m. also but none appeared on behalf of both the parties nor their counsels appeared despite repeatedly calls. The appeal dismissed in default for the parties.” Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that his associate/ advocate could not turn up because he was not well. The counsel submits that learned counsel for respondent has two or three other associates. If he was not feeling well, his other associates should have attended the State Commission. In the interest of justice, we restore the case. The petitioner has already paid litigation charges to the respondents in the sum of Rs.10,000/- but they have not turned up. The case is restored to its original number without any further condition. The parties are directed to appear before the State Commission on 2.4.2013. The State Commission will see to it that further notice is sent to the respondent because they have not appeared. The revision petition is disposed of. | 
