Circuit Bench Nagpur

StateCommission

A/19/379

RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

DEVENDRA DYANDEV MUNGHATE - Opp.Party(s)

S.V. JAISWAL

13 Sep 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCH
NAGPUR
 
First Appeal No. A/19/379
( Date of Filing : 30 Nov 2019 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. CC/22/2018 of District Gadchiroli)
 
1. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
OFFICE AT H BLOCK 1ST FLOOR , DHIRUBHAI AMBANI KNOWLEDGE CITY, NEW MUMBAI 400710
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA
2. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
RELIANCE CENTRE, SOUTH WING, 4TH FLOOR, NEW WESTERN EXPRESS HIGHWAY, SANTAKRUZ EAST, MUMBAI 400055. THROUGH ITS MANAGER.
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. DEVENDRA DYANDEV MUNGHATE
AT KURHADI, TAH AND DIST . GADCHIROLI .
GADCHIROLI
MAHARASHTRA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. DR. S.K. KAKADE PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. A. Z. KHWAJA JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Advocate Mrs.Dehadrai for appellant.
......for the Appellant
 
None
......for the Respondent
Dated : 13 Sep 2022
Final Order / Judgement

Per Hon’ble DR. S.K. Kakade, Presiding Member. 

1)      The appellant Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd. has filed the delay condonation application while filing this appeal against the order passed by learned District Consumer Commission, Gadchiroli in Consumer Case No.CC/22/2018 for condoning the delay of 120 days. Notice of this delay condonation application was served to the respondent who filed the reply to the said application opposing the condonation of delay. Today none appeared for respondent. Heard the learned advocate for appellant on the point of condonation of delay. As per the submission of the learned advocate for appellant the reason for delay is that the appellant had to seek legal opinion and also seek permission from head office at Mumbai and this delay because of mainly getting permission in filing the appeal from head office.

2)      On perusal of record the appellant received the certified copy on 01/03/2019 and filed this appeal on 30/11/2019, as per record. Hence, the actual delay appears to be more than 210 days. Learned advocate has not explained the reasons for delay on day to day basis, hence the application for condoning the delay on the basis administrative ground is hereby rejected with no order as to cost, consequently the appeal does not survive for consideration hence disposed off. 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. DR. S.K. KAKADE]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. A. Z. KHWAJA]
JUDICIAL MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.