No one is present on behalf of the petitioner nor have the documents directed to be filed on the last date been actually filed.  The petition has also been filed after a delay of 74 days.  The grounds stated in the application seeking condonation of this delay are as under :-

“2.  The petitioner further states that the document received from the office were not legible and hence the counsel for the petitioner asked for the original copies of those documents from the Bombay Head Office back in the month of May.  There was difficulty in locating the original document.  But somehow it was found.  The document was received back by the office of the petitioner in the last week of August.  The petitioner thereafter sent those documents to the present advocate for drafting and preparation of the revision petition.  Some time has been taken in the aforesaid work as the documents had to be typed for filing the present revision petition.

3.  The petitioner therefore states that the delay in filing revision petition is neither deliberate nor intentional and has occurred in the circumstances mentioned above.  The petitioner otherwise has very good case on merits and therefore prays that the delay of seventy three days in filing the present petition may be condoned in the interest of justice.”

        It is obvious that the grounds made out for condonation of delay are vague/non-specific and cannot be stated to be “sufficient cause” for explaining this order of delay.

        In view of the foregoing, the revision petition is dismissed for want of prosecution as well as on the ground of delay, which is not condoned.