Maharashtra

Additional DCF, Mumbai(Suburban)

RBT/CC/12/154

MANGALA CHANDRASHEKHAR NIGUDKAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

COUNTRY CLUB (INDIA) LTD, - Opp.Party(s)

LEELA MEHTA

02 Jun 2017

ORDER

Addl. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Mumbai Suburban District
Admin Bldg., 3rd floor, Nr. Chetana College, Bandra-East, Mumbai-51
 
Complaint Case No. RBT/CC/12/154
 
1. MANGALA CHANDRASHEKHAR NIGUDKAR
A, 906/908, SREE NAMAN TOWER, S.V ROAD, BEHIND SHOPPER STOP, KANDIVALI-WEST, MUMBAI-67.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. COUNTRY CLUB (INDIA) LTD,
723/A, PRATHAMESH COMPLEX, VEERA DESAI ROAD EXTN., ANDHERI-WEST, MUMBAI-53.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. S.D.MADAKE PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. S.V.KALAL MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 02 Jun 2017
Final Order / Judgement

PRESENT

                   Complainant in person.                                                       

                  Opponent by representative Adv.Smt.Shradha Worlikar  present.      

         

ORDER

(Per- Mr. S. D. MADAKE, Hon’ble President. )

1.                The complainant Mrs. Mangla Nigudkar filed complaint against opponent county club (India) Ltd. under Section 12 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for deficiency in service.

2.                The complainant paid amount of Rs. 1,75,000/- for service and allotment of plot.  The Services were not as per agreement.  The complainant prayed for refund of amount and compensation.

3.                The opponent filed written statement and denied allegations made in the complaint.  The matter was adjourned for hearing as per section 13 of Consumer Protection Act.

4.                As there exists element of settlement, we directed both parties to take steps for amicable settlement.  Both sides and their counsel tried for settlement.

5.                Today both parties filed consent terms duly signed by both parties and their counsel.  Both sides admitted the signature and contents of the complaint.

6.                The complainant has withdrawn all allegations made in the complaint and the complaint is amicably settled.

7.                The complainant stated that present complaint be dismissed  as withdrawn with no claims of the parties against each other.  The parties entered into memorandum of Understanding.

8.                We have perused the contents of the consent terms and all documents filed on record by both sides.  The complainant has received amount acceptable to her and we found the same to be reasonable.

9.                The opposite party issued the cheque in favour of complainant, which is accepted , by complainant.

10.              In the result, we  pass the following order.

                                               O R D E R

1.                RBT Complaint case No.154/2012  is dismissed.

2.                No order as to  cost.

3.                Copy of this order be sent to both parties.                                                

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. S.D.MADAKE]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. S.V.KALAL]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.