Telangana

Hyderabad

CC/564/2015

Smt. Dasari Surya Lakshmi - Complainant(s)

Versus

Country Club (India) Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

J Prabhakar

28 Jan 2019

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM I HYDERABAD
(9th Floor, Chandravihar Complex, M.J. Road, Nampally, Hyderabad 500 001)
 
Complaint Case No. CC/564/2015
( Date of Filing : 12 Nov 2015 )
 
1. Smt. Dasari Surya Lakshmi
W/o. D Venkateswara Rao, Age 43, Qr. No.B-4, CCC Township, Near Mancherial, Adilabad District.
Adilabad
Telangana
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Country Club (India) Ltd.
Rep. by its M.D. Office.6-3-1219/A, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500016
Hyderabad
Telangana
2. Country Vacations
A Division of Country Club (India) Ltd. Rep. by its Regional Manager, Off. 6-3-1219/A, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500016
Hyderabad
Telangana
3. Country Vacations
Rep. by Sales Manager, A Division of Country Club (India) Ltd. Off. 6-3-1219/A, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500016
Hyderabad
Telangana
4. Country Vacations
Rep. by The Manager, Customer Care Centre, A Division of Country Club (India) Ltd. Off. 6-3-1219/A, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500016
Hyderabad
Telangana
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. P. Vijender PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. D.Nirmala MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 28 Jan 2019
Final Order / Judgement

                                                                                         Date of Filing: 12-11-2015

                                                                                        Date of Order:28-01-2019

 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM – I, HYDERABAD

 

P r e s e n t­

 

HON’BLE Sri P.VIJENDER, B.Sc. L.L.B.  PRESIDENT.

HON’BLE Smt. D.NIRMALA, B.Com., LLB., MEMBER

 

 

Monday, the  28th  day of January, 2019

 

 

C.C.No.564 /2015

 

Between

Smt.Dasari Surya Lakshmi, age: 43 years,

(Membership No.CVHYD3CLUB10LB107388)

W/o.D.Venkateswara Rao,

Qr.No.B-4, CCC Township,

Near Mancherial, Adilabad District,

State of Telangana                                                                        ……Complainant

 

And

  1. Country Club (India)Limited,

Rep by its Managing Director,

Office : 6-3-1219A, Begumpet,

Hyderabad – 500016

  1. Country Vacations,

A Division of  Country Club (India) Ltd.,

Rep. by its Regional Manager,

Office: 6-3-1219A, Begumpet,

Hyderabad – 500016

  1. Sales Manager, Country Vacations,

A Division of  Country Club (India) Ltd.,

Rep. by its Regional Manager,

Office: 6-3-1219A, Begumpet,

Hyderabad – 500016

  1. The Manager,

Customer Care Centre

A Division of  Country Club (India) Ltd.,

Country Vacations,

Office: 6-3-1219A, Begumpet,

Hyderabad – 500016                                            ….Opposite Parties

 

Counsel for the complainant                :  Mr.J.Prabhakar

Counsel for the Opposite Parties      :  Mr. V.V.G.krishna

.                      

   

O R D E R

 

(By Sri P. Vijender, B.Sc., LL.B., President on behalf of the bench)

 

            This complaint is preferred under Section 12 of C.P. Act of 1986 for a direction to  the opposite party to refund an amount of Rs.1,59,000/- collected towards membership fee and a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- as compensation for causing mental agony and physical inconvenience  and  interest on this amount at appropriate rate.

  1. The complainant’s case in brief is that she is permanent resident of Mancherial Mandal  in Adilabad District and  in  the first week of February 2012 she along with her family came to Hyderabad  for shopping. After finishing the shopping work she received coupons for best couple scheme which was given by the staff of opposite party No.1  asking her to  drop  in the drop box provided by the opposite party.  Two weeks later   she received a phone call from the opposite party  informing that they were selected in the draw as best couple and they would be given a gift worth of Rs.30,000/-  in a felicitation  function.  Though the complainant did not evince interest initially staff of opposite party No.3 persistently telephoned in the matter  and requested her to attend the office of opposite party No.2 in   one or two weeks.  They repeatedly  telephoned called hence she visited the office of opposite parties in Begumpet on 7-3-2012 where the opposite party No.3 and 4 were introduced as executives of opposite party No.2 Company.

                   The sales executives of opposite party No.3 company introduced their company as fastest growing  entertainment and  leisure conglomerate in India and multimillion dollar entity and a listed company as BSE, a pioneer in the concept of family clubbing in the country. He stated that it is  having 205 properties having 55 are owned and 175  franchised properties plus a global gateway via country vacations and RCI affiliation of 4000 resorts for its esteemed members.  It was further told to them that a unique benefit to members of joining the club is the facility of transferability of membership from one city to another by paying the deferential membership fee. It is also represented that the opposite party is power house of entertainment and it organizes different shows regularly  by inviting  celebrities from time to time. It was also  informed  that   on joining as a member of opposite party No.2 club they will provide house plot and shopping vouchers  worth Rs.20,000/- for member and if she pays Rs.6,000/- additionally  they need not pay any maintenance charges in future.  They were  further  promised   monthly installment  for a period of 2 years  by SBI Credit Card if the payment is through  Credit card of any bank.  opposite party No.2 will provide  free vacation trip for 7 days in India and  abroad  and accidental coverage of Rs.6,00,000/- to the family of complainant. Having lured by offers of sales executives of opposite party No.2 the complainant agreed to join as a member and  paid a sum of Rs.30,000/- on the same day. Later her husband  paid a sum of Rs.1,29,000/- through Andhra Bank Credit Card.

         Thereafter she and her husband went to Fair Way Extension A,B& C and selected a plot near the main gate  which is located in the north- east corner. The complainant learnt that there is  a discount for nonresidents of Hyderabad  as they cannot use club facilities and she wants use yearly  vacations every year and she has to pay Rs.6,700/- towards maintenance charges. Thereupon she made enquiries  about the shopping coupons worth of Rs.20,000/- and about the  plot agreed to allot  to her and arrangements of EMIs for two years by  SBI Credit card and refund of the discount amount for club members  residing  outside  Hyderabad city.  Then she learnt that the plot chosen by her was already  registered to 3rd  party and she was allotted  another plot No.3429 in the same venture. Then she  spoke to opposite party No.1 to 3 and  addressed a letter on 1-5-2012 enquiring  about the same.  She received reply letter dated 7-5-2012 informing that  the plot allotted to her was  allotted to another person. She is spoke to the  sales executive namely  B.H.A.S Raju  about the shopping vouchers and easy monthly  installments from SBI Credit card  and refund of discount.  On that  the sales executive  addressed  a letter dated 12-05-2012 assuring her that  he will settle all the issues.  While she was  seriously pursing the matter  and copy of  Inter office memo dated 09-8-2012  was issued   by the opposite party  along with letter stating that they have failed  in their commitment  to allot the selected  plot  therefore  they are ready to refund Rs.75,000/-. Thereafter on 15-11-2012 and 09-08-2012 she addressed  letters to refund  an amount as assured by them. But there was no proper response.  The complainant and her husband spent lot of amount towards travelling from their place to Hyderabad   to meet the sales executives of the opposite party at Hyderabad.  After that she received  letters dated 23-02-2013 and 7-3-2013 informing  that the amount of Rs.70,000/- will be refunded to her  through 3 installments from the date of approval.  In view of the letters and offers of opposite parties she  did not approach  any Forum or Court at the earliest. But  the opposite party  did not come forward  either to refund the amount or to settle the issue hence got issued a registered letter  on 8-10-2013asking the opposite party to cancel the membership  and refund the  entire amount collected  but there was no response.  She approached  Sanghamitra Consumers Councel, Adilabad which issued a notice to opposite party No.3 on 16-11-2013 and also  a reminder  on 18-3-2014. On 19-4-2014  one Mr. Komareshan K.S. Regional Manager, Country Vacations  telephoned and also sent  a mail  informing that the matter will be settled  but even after that  there was  no response. Thereupon she approached  the Forum at Adilabad on 9-12-2014 through  Sanghamitra Council, Adilabad but the  complaint was returned  asking her to file a complaint at Hyderabad. Hence the present complaint for the reliefs stated supra. 

  1. Common written version is filed on behalf of the opposite parties admitting  about the  payment of Rs.1,59,000 by the complainant  towards membership  but denied the other allegations made in the complaint.  The substance of the written version is that Country Club hospitality and holidays limited is leading hospitality company that offers state of the art clubbing facilities   innovative family holiday packages and star studded entertainment events.   It has 53 own properties, 25 fitness centers and 42 associated resorts across 4 countries.  It caters to only families and is committed to providing  facilities to  spend quality time with each other.  It provides  club facilities , fitness centres, family vacation spots  and festival celebrations  for members.  The opposite party has been recognized by the Guinness book of world records for conducting  Asia’s largest new year  bash  with over 15,000/- people  attending the event in 14 locations.  It is also involved in C.S.R activities   such as blood donation camps and some other  activities. Its customer care  team also contacts the member to explain the products’  any further clarifications or assistance. 

            The complainant jointed as member in the club and signed on the  purchase  agreement on 24-3-2012 and paid a sum of Rs.1,59,000/-   as life membership to her and spouse  and same is non-refundable as per the terms and conditions of purchase agreement.  As per the terms and conditions  of membership, the complainant is entitled to book holidays for 6 nights 7 days for 10 consecutive years in the  resorts  of  it.  The complainant  was allotted  a plot  No.3429 admeasuring  150 Sq.yards in its venture at Shaila Bhoomi at Srisilam Road  subject to payment of full membership fee and development and registration charges    of Rs.49,999/- . But the complainant  failed to pay it till date.  Even now the opposite parties are willing to register the said complimentary plot  in favour of the complainant  on payment of above said amounts.  The complainant has to pay the annual maintenance charges irrespective of usage of club facilities.  It  denied that the opposite parties executives promised the complainant if she pays Rs.6,000/-  additionally she need not pay any maintenance charges in future for availing the vacations.  There was no promise to arrange EMI  of two years.  The claim of the complainant that she and her husband  visited their venture  and selected the plot is false.  There is no truth in the complainant’s allegations that plot selected by her was registered to someone else. No one offered to refund the membership amount of Rs.75,000/- and the alleged letter issued by the  person is not binding on the  opposite parties as he was not authorized to issue a letter for refund of  the  amount as the amount paid is non-refundable. Required facilities are available with opposite parties  and it is for the complainants to utilize the same  and failure to utilize is not fault of the opposite parties.  AT the time of  entering  into membership the complainant  was  clearly informed that the membership fee paid is not refundable.  Since membership agreement is valid contract, one of the parties to the contract cannot be repudiated unilaterally. The complainant was aware of terms and conditions of this membership agreement at the time of signing of it and now she cannot quit out from it.  Hence complainant is neither entitled the refund of amount nor any compensation as there is no deficiency of service on the part of the opposite parties.   

        The complainant has filed a rejoinder to the written version of the opposite parties  and substance of the same is reiteration of the complaint itself . 

         In the enquiry stage the complainant has filed   her evidence affidavit reiterating the substance of the complaint and he also got exhibited Seventeen (17) documents.    Similarly for the  Opposite Party    evidence affidavit of  C.M.Sridhar stated to be  Assistant Manager of  opposite party No.2 is filed and substance of the same is  reiteration of defense set out in the written version  and through him got exhibited three (3) documents   Both the parties have filed written arguments and supplemented the same with the oral submissions. 

            On a consideration of material available on  record the following points have emerged for consideration .        

  1. Whether the complainant is entitled to seek refund of the amount paid towards the membership and compensation claimed?
  2. To what relief?

Point No.1:  The complainant’s version that when she and her husband were in Hyderabad in the work on 1st week of February, 2012 for shopping at Himayatnagar they were approached  by sales executive of the opposite parties with coupons asking them to fill the same and drop  in the  drop box is not denied by the opposite parties either in written version  or  in the evidence affidavit  filed  on their behalf. It is not denied by the opposite parties  that about two weeks thereafter  a  telephone call was made to the complainant  by opposite party No.3 informing that they  were selected in the draw  as best couple and would get gift worth of Rs.30,000/- and later after follow up telephone calls  from the  sales executives of  opposite party  they came down to the office of opposite party at Begumpet on 7-3-2012. In the light of it, it can be safely said that the complainant and her husband have not visited opposite party No.2 office at Begumpet on 7-3-2012 on their own and they were lured by the sales executives of opposite parties.   They paid an amount of Rs.30,000/- in cash on 7-3-2012 and thereafter further sum of Rs.1,29,000/-by the  complainant’s husband through his Andhra Bank credit card is also not denied by the opposite parties .  It is the complainant’s case that they visited the  venture of opposite party  namelys Fairway Extension, A,B and C selected a plot situate near the main gate on the north-east corner.  Though this has been denied by the opposite parties the letter of correspondence  between the parties supports the complainant’s version.    Ex.A7 letter from the office of opposite party No.2 dated 7-5-2012  in   which it has been  categorically undertaken to register the plot on receipt of the amount of Rs.30,000/-. It is  further  stated that if for any reason the allotted plot cannot be registered  alternate plot  will be  allotted  in any of the other venture  wherever is possible. In  this letter the plot number  communicated the complainant was 3429.  Ex.A9 is Inter office memo of the opposite parties dated 9-8-2012 in which it has been categorically stated  that as per  the commitment  the opposite parties are unable to give the schedule plot as same was already registered to 3rd parties. The next letter  from the opposite parties  is Ex.A12 by which has been categorically stated that  commitment made to the complainant at the time of joining as a member on 7-3-2012 could not be fulfilled as committed plot was already registered  in some other’s name. It is further stated in this letter that as per the commitment given by Mr.Ajay Srinivas Raju  and Mr.Santosh, Sales Managers on 9-8-2012, finally  the approval  is received on 6-03-2013 to refund an amount of Rs.75,000/- to the complainant,  hence it will be refunded by way of three installments  after 90 working  days.  Though the opposite party has stated that the person who sent these letters is not authorized at the same time it is not case of the opposite parties that Srinivas Raju  and Mr.Santosh are not the  Managers (Sales) of the company as on the date of sending of Ex.A12 letter.

             The complainant’s version  that they were promised to provide installments  from SBI   Credit card hence the  amount was paid through Andhra Bank Credit card is also denied by the opposite parties stating that no one offered to the complainant  to grant installments by SBI credit card. But Ex.A8 is letter signed by Srinivas Raju   addressed to the complainant stating that he had discussed with Accounts  personnel   and  will take the Post dated cheques for EMI. The next subject is  regarding  subscription  rebate  as  the complainant was not residing in Hyderabad  and for that the P.Srinivas Raju informed the complainant  that he will discuss this  aspect with higher officials  and settle the concession part.  Ex.A11  is another letter to the complainant  from the Himayath nagar office of opposite party and subject of this letter is  refund of amount for not allotting   committed plot.  From this letter  it is crystal clear stated that as per the commitment the opposite party was unable to give selected plot as it was already registered in some other’s name and the commitment  made by P. Ajay Srinivas Raju and Mr.Santosh on 9-08-2012  refund of amount of Rs.75,000/-on 23-02-2013. These letters are in response to the letter addressed by the complainant under Ex.A6 and A10 seeking refund to the amount as committed plot was not being registered. This letter of correspondence between the parties fortifies the complainant’s version  of promising  the arranging EMIs and compensation for not utilizing the club facilities  at Hyderabad. She  was constrained  to seek cancellation of membership  and ask refund of amount as promises   made were not honored.  Admittedly even as on today  the complainant has not utilized  any of the facilities  though the amount  of Rs.1,59,000/- was paid towards membership fee.

                As rightly pleaded by the complainant, she and her husband were lured to join as a member’s with the promise of  state of art facilities  at various places by the sales executives  of opposite parties  and the promise  house plot.  One of the plea taken by the opposite parties is admission fee paid is non- refundable as per the terms and conditions  of purchase agreement  Ex.B1 which is concluded contract between the parties.  As could be seen from Ex.B1 it was signed by P. Ajay Srinivas Raju on behalf of opposite party No.2. But the version of opposite party No.2 is said P. Ajay Srinivas Raju is not an authorized person  to promise for  refund an amount of Rs.75,000/-. The  opposite party is cannot be permitted to take two inconsistent pleas about the  status of P. Ajay Srinivas Raju.  That apart the opposite party has not placed any record to show its ownership  of the  plot  offered to the complainant  and there is no schedule of the said plot and in absence of the same it cannot be said that Ex.B1 is a complete concluded contract with mutual obligations and rights incorporating  a clause as non-refundable.  The opposite parties cannot be permitted  enrich themselves  at the cost of  innocent persons      like complainant.  Even for the sake of the  arguments it is accepted  that because of non-refundable  clause  in the purchase agreement Ex.B1 is still in view of the subsequent developments and promises made by the concerned person to refund the amount of Rs.75,000/- itself is sufficient to say that the opposite parties have given a go by the terms and conditions  of Ex.B1 agreement.  Hence the complainant is entitled to seek refund of the entire amount of Rs.1,59,000/-.  She is also entitled to claim interest as said amount has been  utilized by the opposite parties  for  its  business purpose.  Hence the opposite parties are liable to pay interest @ 18% p.a on the said amount  from  the date of receiving from the complainant  to the date of payment to her. 

          The opposite parties are  liable to pay compensation because  even after collecting a huge amount of Rs.1,59,000/- from the  complainant   they have failed to register the  plot chosen by the complainant and thereby caused mental agony and sufferance. Hence they are liable to pay compensation of Rs.50,000/- to the complainant.  Accordingly  the point is answered. 

Point No.2: In the result, the complaint is  partly allowed directing the opposite parties

  1. To refund  an amount of Rs.1,59,000/- with interest @ 18% p.a from the date of collecting the amount  from the complainant to  the date of payment
  2. The opposite parties further directed to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- as compensation for causing mental agony and physical inconvenience.
  3.  The opposite parties are liable to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- as costs of the complaint.

Time for compliance is 30 days from the date of service of this order

                        Dictated to steno transcribed and typed by her pronounced  by us on this the  28th day of January , 2019

 

 

 

MEMBER                                                                                            PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

 

PW1                                                                                                      DW1  

Smt.Dasari Surya Lakshmi                                                  C.M.Sridhar         

 

 

 

Exs. filed on behalf of the Complainant:

Ex.A1 is receipt dated 7/3/2012

Ex.A2 is  copy of debit sale receipt

Ex..A3 is also a receipt

Ex.A4 and A5 are also receipts

Ex.A6 is letter dated 1-5-2012 addressed to the opposite  party by the complainant

Ex.A7 is letter of allotment dated  7-05-2012

Ex.A8 is letter dated 12-05-2012 by A.S.Raju

Ex.A9  is Inter office memo

Ex.A10 is  letter   addressed to the opposite  party by the complainant

Ex.A11 is letter dated 18-2-2013  by the opposite party to the complainant

Ex.A12 is letter dt.7-3-2013 addressed to the complainant by the opposite party

Ex.A13 is  letter   addressed dated 8-10-2013 to the opposite  party by the complainant

Ex.A14 is notice dated 16-11-2013 to the opposite party by  the consumer council Sanghamithra

Ex.A15 is reminder No.1  dated 18-03-2014 to the opposite party by  the consumer council Sanghamithra

Ex.A16 is Gmail  correspondence

Ex.A17 is reminder No.2 dated 16-07-2014 to the opposite party by  the consumer council Sanghamithra

Exs. filed on behalf of the Opposite parties

 

Ex.B1 is copy  of  purchase agreement for club and vacation membership

Ex.B2 is  copy of purchase agreement for club and vacation membership

Ex.B3 is copy of lay out

 

 

 

MEMBER                                                                                            PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. P. Vijender]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. D.Nirmala]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.