Kerala

Kozhikode

CC/408/2019

A.K. RAMACHANDRAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

CORPORATION BANK - Opp.Party(s)

31 May 2024

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KARANTHUR PO,KOZHIKODE
 
Complaint Case No. CC/408/2019
( Date of Filing : 12 Dec 2019 )
 
1. A.K. RAMACHANDRAN
SREENIDHI HOUSE,JANATHA ROAD ,P.O VATAKARA ,KOZHIKODE-673101
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. CORPORATION BANK
CORPORATE OFFICE,MANGALA DEVI TEMPLE ROAD,PANDESWARE ,MANGALORE-575001,KARNATAKA
2. CORPORATION BANK ,REP.BY MANAGER
THIRUVALLUR BRANCH,KOZHIKODE-673041
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. P.C .PAULACHEN , M.Com, LLB PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. PRIYA . S , BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 31 May 2024
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOZHIKODE

PRESENT: Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN, M.Com, LLB    : PRESIDENT

Smt. PRIYA.S, BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) :  MEMBER

Friday the 31th day of May 2024

CC.408/2019

Complainant

A.K. Ramachandran,

S/o. Kunjukkunju,

Sreenidhi (HO), Janatha Road,

P.O. Vatakara, Vatakara Taluk,

Kozhikode – 673101

(By Adv. C. Baskaran)

Opposite Parties

  1.               Corporation Bank,

Corporate Office,

Mangala Devi Temple Road,

Pandesware, Managalore – 575001

                        Karnataka.

  1.               Corporation Bank,

Rep. by Manager,

Thiruvallor Branch,

Kozhikode – 673041

(OP2 By Adv. K.T. Vikas)

ORDER

By Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN  – PRESIDENT.

          This is a complaint filed under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, alleging unfair trade practice and deficiency of service on the part of the opposite parties. 

  1. The opposite parties have resisted the complaint by filing written version denying the allegations and claims made in the complaint. 
  2. The case is posted for the affidavit of the complainant as last chance today. But the complainant remained absent and there is no representation for him. The onus is on the complainant to prove the allegations. But the complainant failed to let in any evidence to prove the case so as to get an order as prayed for. The complainant is continuously absent and it appears that he is not interested in pursuing the matter. The allegations are not proved.

In the result, the complaint is dismissed. No order as to costs.  

 

Pronounced in open Commission on this, the 31st  day of May, 2024.

 

Date of Filing:  12.12.2019

 

           

 

                                                        Sd/-                                                                                              Sd/-

                                               PRESIDENT                                                                                 MEMBER

 

APPENDIX

Nil.

 

 

                                                      Sd/-                                                                                                  Sd/-

                                              PRESIDENT                                                                                    MEMBER

 

 

True Copy,      

 

 

                                                                                                                                                        Sd/-

                                                       Assistant Registrar.      

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. P.C .PAULACHEN , M.Com, LLB]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. PRIYA . S , BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM)]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.