Petitioner has filed this Review Application seeking review of order dated 27.01.12 of this Commission by which the Revision Petition No.3799 of 2011 filed by the Petitioner was dismissed and the order passed by the State Commission, Maharashtra was upheld by observing as under:-

“        We agree with the view taken by the State Commission.  Respondent/opposite party had informed the petitioner vide its letter dated 26.05.1997 that the costs of the flat had been increased from Rs.2,80,000/- to Rs.3,43,500/- which was payable in eight equal installments in addition to Rs.3,125/- for supply of electricity.  Petitioner was asked to submit an affidavit accepting the revised costs, otherwise the tenement was to be cancelled presuming that the petitioner was not interested in tenement.  Petitioner/complainant informed the respondent/ opposite party that the revised price was not acceptable to him and he shall make the payment only on completion of the final work which shows that the petitioner was not interested to continue as a member of the scheme.  In terms of the letter written by the complainant/petitioner, the respondent cancelled the booking and refunded the amount deposited by him.  The State Commission is absolutely right in observing that at this stage, the petitioner cannot be heard to say that he should be allotted tenement in place of the refund of the amount already paid by him.  Dismissed.

An order can be reviewed only if there is a mistake apparent on the face of the record.  We have passed the above order in the presence of the Petitioner in person based on the evidence available on record. We do not find any mistake apparent on the face of the record. No ground for review is made out.  Dismissed. 

Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Petitioner.