Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/14/2014

RAGHAVENDRAN GOPALAKRISHNAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SAHARA PRIME CITY LIMITED - Opp.Party(s)

G. KRISHNAMURTHY

13 Oct 2015

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

       BEFORE        Thiru. J.JAYARAM                  PRESIDING  JUDICIAL MEMBER

                                 Tmt. P. BAKIYAVATHI                                                  MEMBER

 

C.C.NO. 14/2014

                                                                  DATED THIS THE 13^th  DAY OF OCTOBER 2015

 

Raghavendran Gopalakrishnan

S/o Late Gopalakrishnan

1142, Sobha Ruby platinum

8^th Mile, Nagasandra post

Tumkur Rd, Bangaluru 560 073                       ..complainant

                                             Vs

1.     Chief Executive Officer, Sahara Prime City Ltd

 Sahara India Centre; No.2, Kapoorthala complex

Lucknow, Utter Pradesh – 226 024                            

 

2. Sales Manager, Sahara Prime City Ltd

Sathy Rd, Viswapuram, Saravanapatti,

Coimbatore 641 035                                     ..opposite parties

 

Counsel for the complainant          : M/s G.M.Shankar

Counsel for 1^st opposite party        : M/s P.R.Associates

Counsel for 2^nd opposite party       : M/s Deiva Sigamani

 

                                                      ORDER

Thiru. J.JAYARAM, PRESIDING  JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

                 No representation for complainant for the past hearings from July 2014. On 11.6.2015 also since there was no representation for the complainant, the case was adjourned to 20.7.2015, specifically for the appearance of the complainant or for disposal and again reposted to 10.8.2015 and again to 16.9.2015, and since there was no sitting on that day, it was again reposted to 13.10.2015. The complainant has not appeared for those hearings also, and today also there is no representation for the complainant. Complainant is also absent, thereby showing that the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Therefore no useful purpose will be served in keeping the complaint on file. Hence the complaint is dismissed for default.

        Sd/-                                                                                                      Sd/-

P.BAKIYAVATHI                                                                           J.JAYARAM         

        MEMBER                                                               PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER