Orissa

Nabarangapur

CC/189/2015

Sujit Kumar pattnaik - Complainant(s)

Versus

CEO./Associate bussiness partner,Coustomer Care,DNA Mobile Product India Pvt.Ltd.,Kolkata - Opp.Party(s)

18 Apr 2016

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NABARANGPUR
Heading 2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/189/2015
( Date of Filing : 14 Dec 2015 )
 
1. Sujit Kumar pattnaik
At-Ichhabatiguda
Nabarangpur
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. CEO./Associate bussiness partner,Coustomer Care,DNA Mobile Product India Pvt.Ltd.,Kolkata
53,Jadavpur,Kolkata
West Bengal
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. LAXMI NARAYAN PADHY PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. ASWINI KUMAR MOHAPATRA MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. MEENAKHI PADHI MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 18 Apr 2016
Final Order / Judgement

MR LAXMI NARAYAN PADHI, PRESIDENT…                     The brief story of the complaint is that, the complainant has a mobile shop by name & style Digital Studio Life at Jeypore. Under a scheme, the OP floated DNA antivirus products and complainant procured huge number of DNA antivirus for mobiles, by paying Rs.50,044/- for 97 pieces on dt.29.5.14, 62 pieces on dt.12.6.14 for Rs.30,000/- and 110 pieces on dt.30.6.14 for Rs.50,060/-, on such conditions of contract as made with the OP. The OP under the scheme has tie ups with the oriental insurance Co & Tata AIG antivirus products to customers, but found that, there is no insurance and no antivirus benefits in the products. The customer purchasing the product demanded the return of the price of the product, and the OP.s does not respond to the complaint. Hence, duped of a large amount of money on purchasing of the product, which was procured him through hand loans from friends and relatives, hence for such delivery of service he claimed a compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- inter alia other reliefs.

2.         The complainant as filed nothing in support of his contention.

3.         Notice served upon OP along with copy of complaint. But the notice could not be served and returned, with note of posts “addressee left”  "addressee unknown" etc.

4.         The complainant also failed to file any memo, depicting the correct address of OP, non represented for issuance of any proclamation to enforce the presence of OP. Hence for want of proper address of OP, the complaint is dismissed on default.

5.         As thus the complaint petition is disposed off. Free copies of this extract be supplied to the parties on demand. No cost. Pronounced in the open forum on this the 18th April' 2016.

 

  Sd/-                      Sd/-                                       Sd/-

MEMBE          MEMBER                    PRESIDENT, DCDRF,

                                                                 NABARANGPUR.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. LAXMI NARAYAN PADHY]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. ASWINI KUMAR MOHAPATRA]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MEENAKHI PADHI]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.