West Bengal

Howrah

CC/203/2017

SAURAV MAJI, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Calcutta Institute of Technology, - Opp.Party(s)

Arup Kumar

28 Dec 2017

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH
20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah 711 101.
Office (033) 2638 0892, Confonet (033) 2638 0512 Fax (033) 2638 0892
 
Complaint Case No. CC/203/2017
 
1. SAURAV MAJI,
C/O. Susanta Maji, Vill. Gopalpur, P.O. and P.S. Bagnan, Howrah 711303.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Calcutta Institute of Technology,
Vill and P.O. Banitabla, P.S. Uluberia, Howrah 711316.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Abdul Kuddus PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Banani Mohanta, Ganguli MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Sajal Kanti Jana MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 28 Dec 2017
Final Order / Judgement

DATE OF FILING :  :         05.07.2017.

DATE OF S/R            :          10.08.2017.

DATE OF  ORDER   :         28.12.2017.

Saurav Maji,    

c/o. Susanta Maji,  

village Gopalpur, P.O. & P.S. Bagnan,  

PIN 711 303. .………………….……………..…………….……..…… COMPLAINANT.

  • Versus   -

Calcutta Institute of Technology,

Village & P.O. Banitabla, P.S. Uluberia,

Howrah 711 316.  .………………………………………...…….……OPPOSITE PARTY.

P    R    E     S    E    N     T

Hon’ble President :  Abdul Kuddus.

Hon’ble Member : Shri Sajal Kanti Jana.

Hon’ble Member :  Smt. Banani Mohanta ( Ganguli ).

F  I   N   A    L       O   R   D    E     R

Facts of the case of the complainant, in short, is that  this complainant got admitted in Calcutta Institute of Technology in MCA Course  in the year 2012 and Rs. 57,600/- was paid including caution money amounting to Rs. 5,000/-. This complainant completed his MCA Course on 17.07.2015. Thereafter he approached the o.p. institution to refund his caution money amounting to Rs. 5,000/- but o.p. institute  declined to refund the same. So this complainant has filed this complaint and made prayer for making direction upon the o.p. to refund Rs. 5,000/- paid to the o.p. college as caution money and Rs. 25,000/- as compensation for his harassment and Rs. 5,000/- as cost of litigation.    

This case is being contested by the o.p., Calcutta Institute of Technology, by filing Written Version denying all allegations as made in the petition of complaint, contending interalia that the complaint is not maintainable, there is no cause of action. The specific case of the o.p. is that it is within the knowledge of the complainant  that the caution money is refundable;  subject to submission of filing of special form for refund of caution money and along with no claim certificate, original receipt; but this complainant did not file such prescribed form and documents as required.   

POINTS FOR DETERMINATION  :

i)          Is the case maintainable in its present form ?

ii)         Whether the complainant is a ‘Consumer’ as per provision of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ?

iii)        Whether there is any deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the o.ps as alleged ?

iv)        Whether the complainant is entitled to the reliefs as prayed for ?

DECISION  WITH   REASONS      :

            Heard complainant in person and heard ld. advocate for the o.p. Perused the petition of complaint and the written version and the photo copies of documents. It appears that it is not disputed that this complainant deposited Rs. 5,000/- refundable as caution money to the o.p. institution. The dispute is that the o.p. institution has not paid back the said amount.  So this complainant has filed this petition of complaint. On the other hand o.p. has admitted the fact of deposit of caution money of Rs. 5,000/- by the complainant. But the o.p. company  could not be able to refund the same for non filing of the special form for refund of money, no claim certificate and the original receipt  showing payment of Rs.5,000/- as caution money. During argument the complainant has expressed his intention to deposit the form duly filled in as pointed out by the ld. advocate for the  o.p.        

            In view of the circumstances we hold that complainant is entitled to refund Rs. 5,000/- deposited as caution money to the o.p. institution.

            In this case, complainant has also prayed for compensation to the tune of Rs. 25,000/- for his harassment. On perusal of the case record, we find that there is no evidence on record on behalf of the complainant to satisfy us about basis or reasons on which this complainant has arrived at having suffered loss of Rs. 25,000/- due to non refund of caution money. So claim of compensation of Rs. 25,000/- is very much high.

Considering the material on records we are of the opinion that if Rs. 200/- is awarded as compensation in favour of complainant for his harassment then none would prejudiced. 

We do not like to pass any order with regards to prayer for litigation costs as this case is being conducted by the complainant in person.  

In view of the circumstances, we are inclined to allow this petition of complaint.     

            In the result, this consumer complaint succeeds in part.

Hence,            

                                                          O     R     D      E      R      E        D      

            That the C. C. Case No. 203 of 2017 ( HDF 203 of 2017 )  be  and the same is allowed on contest against o.p.  but without cost.  

That the o.p. is hereby  directed to refund Rs. 5,000/- deposited by complainant to o.p. / institute  as caution money  within 15 days from the date of receipt  of (i) Special Form for refund of caution money duly filled in; (ii) Claim Certificate duly filled in with  full signature of complainant ; ( iii) Original receipt.

Complainant is directed to submit the forms and document as  mentioned above duly filled in under his  full signature to the o.p. by 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of the judgment.

Rs. 200/- is hereby awarded as compensation for harassment and mental agony.

The other prayer made by the complainant is rejected.

If the o.p. fails to pay the amount awarded above within the period mentioned above then complainant is at liberty to get this order implemented with due course of law.  

            Let a  plain copy of the judgment  be given to  both parties, free of costs, as early as possible.  

DICTATED  &    CORRECTED

BY   ME.  

                                                              

  (    Abdul Kuddus )                                              

  President,  C.D.R.F., Howrah.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Abdul Kuddus]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Banani Mohanta, Ganguli]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sajal Kanti Jana]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.