Petitioner was a consumer of respondent board for provision of electricity connection to run an industrial unit. In a raid that was carried out by officials of respondent board it was noticed that against sanctioned load of 95 HP connected load was 97 HP. A demand of Rs. 2,16,589/- was accordingly raised against petitioner on 29.7.2003 on the basis of audit report. The petitioner knocked door of consumer fora by filing a complaint which witnessed 3 round of litigation between parties. Both District Forum and State Commission having found no merits in case of petitioner dismissed the complaint. If we go by finding of State Commission, State Commission having noticed averments made in complaint by petitioner about running industrial unit by means of self employment for earning livelihood, petitioner was not a consumer. That apart in matter of demand raised by respondent board State Commission mentioning a finding that bills raised by respondent board were not time barred. We find no good reasons to interfere with finding of State Commission and in result the revision petition is dismissed but with no order as to cost.