| Complaint Case No. CC/251/2023 | | ( Date of Filing : 03 Aug 2023 ) |
| | | | 1. SABU THOMAS | | THAKIDIYIL HOUSE PARAMPUZHA .P.O KOTTAYAM |
| ...........Complainant(s) | |
| Versus | | 1. C E O ,LENOVO REGISTERED OFFICE ,INDIA | | FERNS ICON LEVEL 2 ,OUTER RING ROAD DODDENEKUNDI MAHADEVAPURA BANGALORE KARNATAKA 560 037 | | 2. BISMI CONNECT Pvt.Ltd | | CORPORATE OFFICE ,CSTLE VLANY T V S JUNCTION KALAMASSERY KOCHI -683104 CHENNAI 600 0014 | | 3. THE MANAGER | | BISMI CONNECT Pvt.Ltd 8/132A 132/B 132/C NEAR MATHRUBHUMI NAGAMBADAM KOTTAYAM 686 001 | | 4. THE MANAGER | | SERVICE CENTRE CONSERVE INFOTEC Pvt.Ltd QUBEFIX,FIRST FLOOR ,KURUPS TOWER 3 KODIMATHA ,KOTTAYAM 686 013 |
| ............Opp.Party(s) |
|
|
| Final Order / Judgement | IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM Dated, the 29th day of July, 2024 Present: Sri. Manulal V.S. President Smt. Bindhu R. Member Sri. K.M. Anto, Member C C No. 251/2023 (Filed on 03.08.2023) Complainant | : | Sabu Thomas aged 52/23, S/o KunjachanThomas, Thakidiyil House, Parampuzha P.O., Kottayam, Kerala, India. (Adv. Ann Mary Abraham) | Opposite parties | 1. | CEO, Lenovo Registered Office, India, Ferns Icon, Level 2, Outer Ring Road, Doddenekundi, Mahadevapura, Bangalore, Karnataka, India -560037. (Adv. OM Prakash, Adv. Aravnd Ajith & Adv. Midhunraj P.R) | | 2. | Bismi Connect Pvt.,Ltd., Corporate Office, Castle Vilany TVS Junction, Kalamassery, Kochi 683104. | | 3. | The Manager, Bismi Connect Private Limited 8/132A, 132B, 132C, Near Mathrubhoomi Nagampadom, Kottayam 686001. (Adv. T.J. Lakshmanan) | | 4. | 4. The Manager Service Centre, Conserve Infotech Pvt. Ltd., Company, Qubefix 1st Floor, Kurup's Tower 3, Kodimatha, Kottayam- 686013. |
O R D E R Sri. Manulal V.S. President The complaint is filed under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration. After hearing the matter the Commission passed an order as follows: This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite parties and opposite parties 1 to 3 appeared before the Commission and filed version. Notice sent to the 4th opposite party and the same was returned unserved. Since 30.10.2023 this case was posted for taking steps by the complainant against the 4th opposite party. When the case came up for consideration today, it is noticed that the complainant was continuously absent since 09.04.2024 and not taken any steps against the 4th opposite party, inspite of giving sufficient opportunities for the same. In the above circumstances we find that the complainant is not interested to further proceed with this complaint. In view of the above discussion we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed for default. In the result the complaint is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost. Pronounced in the Open Commission on this the 29th day of July, 2024 Sri. Manulal V.S, President Sd/- Smt. Bindhu R. Member Sd/- Sri. K.M.Anto. Member Sd/- APPENDIX : Exhibits from the side of the Complainant : NIL Exhibits from the side of the Opposite Parties : NIL By Order, Sd/- Assistant Registrar | |
