West Bengal

Dakshin Dinajpur

CC/105/2022

Shri Subrata Mukherjee, S/O- Late Suresh Chandra Mukherjee - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bubai Ghosh, Proprietor of Annapurna Travels - Opp.Party(s)

Siddhartha De

31 May 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Dakshin Dinajpur, Balurghat, West Bengal
Old Sub jail Market Complex, 2nd Floor, P.O. Balurghat, Dist. Dakshin Dinajpur Pin-733101
 
Complaint Case No. CC/105/2022
( Date of Filing : 15 Dec 2022 )
 
1. Shri Subrata Mukherjee, S/O- Late Suresh Chandra Mukherjee
Vill & P.O.- Gopalganj, P.S.- Kumarganj, Pin- 733141
Dakshin Dinajpur
West Bengal
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Bubai Ghosh, Proprietor of Annapurna Travels
Vill- Kamarpara, Bose Para, GT Road, P.O. & P.S.- Panduya, Pin- 712149
Hooghly
West Bengal
2. Sekh Jamaluddin
Kamarpara, Bose Para, GT Road, P.O. & P.S.- Panduya, Pin- 712149
Hooghly
West Bengal
3. Biswajit Pathak, S/O- Bartan Pathak
Kamarpara, Bose Para, GT Road, P.O. & P.S.- Panduya, Pin- 712149
Hooghly
West Bengal
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Shyam Prakash Rajak PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Rumki Samajdar MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kanti Sarkar MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Siddhartha De, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 31 May 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Today is fixed for passing ex-parte order/ judgement

 The instant case has been initiated by the complainant U/S – 35 of C.P. Act, 2019 against the Opposite Parties claiming an amount of Rs.23,000/- from Sekh Jamaluddin @ Jamal Bhai + Compensation – Rs.30,000/- + Litigation Cost – Rs. 10,000/- total = Rs.63,000/-.  

 

The fact of the case, in brief, is that the Complainant and his friends and relatives plan to visit Jajhdam to Somnath via Gaya, Budhgaya, Kashi, Biswanath, Allahabad , Chitrakut, Agra, Brindaban, Delhi, Haridwar, Ajodhya, Rajsthan, Joypur, Sabitri, Puskar, Huratm Dwarika, Ved Dwarika 22 days around 40 persons. For this  tour the Complainant made a  contract with Opposite Party No.1 under the influence of Opposite Party No.2 & 3 on 18.09.2022 and also advance Rs.9,000/- on 18.09.2022.  The total amount of contract was Rs.3,40,000/- and  out of Rs.3,40,000/- the Complainant paid Rs.14,000/- in two installment to the Opposite Party No.2 from the account of the grandson of one tour member namely Iswar Mohanta through phone Pe. But on the date of above mentioned tour the Opposite Party No.1 did not sent his bus or any other any other car as per contract. As a result, the Complainant and her friends & relatives faced great difficulties and they have to rent another car with huge money for their tour. Thereafter, after return from tour the Complainant repeatedly went to the Opposite Parties for refund of their money verbally, but all efforts were in vain. Having no alternative, the Complainant filed this case for redress.

 

        It appears from the case record that notice were issued to the Opposite Parties  but after receiving the notices the Opposite Parties did not appear in this case so, the case is proceeded ex parte against the Opposite Parties.

 

 To prove his case, the complainant has submitted the following documents-

(I) Photo copy of contract paper dated 18.09.2022

(ii) Photo copy of e-payment  through Phone Pe

(iii)  Photo copy of serial number of seats of passengers

(vi) Photo copy of Aadhar Card of the Complainant.

(v) Certificate of Prodhan of Kumarganj Block 

(vi) Copy of list of Passengers.

 

 

                                         DECISION  WITH  REASONS

          

              We have heard argument by Ld. Advocates for the Complainant.  Perused the case record and the documents filed by the Complainant.

 

 On perusal of the contract paper in between the parties dated 18.09.2022, it appears that there had been a contract for a tour to visit the places as mentioned in the plaint. The allegation of the Complaint that on the date of journey, the Opposite Parties did not send bus for tour. The allegation of the Complainant can not be disbelieved because in spite of receiving notice of the case, the Opposite Party did not appear before this Commission to contest the case.  Again, on perusal of documents regarding e-payment, it appears that a sum of Rs.14,000/- has been paid through Phone Pe. It also appears from the contract paper that the Complainant has paid Rs.9,000/-  as advance at the time of contract. Thus, the Complainant has total Rs. 9,000/- + Rs.14,000/-  = Rs.23,000/- to the Opposite Parties. All this amount has been received by the Opposite Party No.2 on behalf of the Annapurna Travels.  As the Opposite parties did not challenge the case of the Complainant despite of valid service of notice. We opine that the case of the Complainant is genuine and he is entitled to get the relief as prayed for.

 

         In view of the above mentioned discussions, it has been established that the Complainant is a bona fide consumer to the Opposite Parties and there is deficiency in service on the part of the Opposite Parties.

 

 

 

 

 Hence, it is

                                                         O R D E R E D

           

          That the Consumer Case No. 105 of 2022 is hereby allowed ex parte in part but with cost against the Opposite Parties.   

           The Opposite Parties are directed to pay jointly or severally  a sum of Rs.23,000/- together with an interest @ 8% p.a. from 18.09.2022 till the full realization to the Complainant by issuing an account payee cheque within 45 days from the date of passing of this order. The Opposite Parties are further directed to  pay Rs. 5,000/- toward Compensation and Rs.5,000/- towards litigation cost  within 45 days from the date of passing of this order by issuing an account payee cheque in favour of the Complainant failing which the Complainant is at liberty to execute the order as per law.

              Let a plain copy of this order be supplied to the parties free of cost.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Shyam Prakash Rajak]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Rumki Samajdar]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kanti Sarkar]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.