Kerala

Kottayam

CC/1/2020

Philomina sebastian - Complainant(s)

Versus

Benny Joseph - Opp.Party(s)

Siby Mathew

09 Mar 2021

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kottayam
Kottayam
 
Complaint Case No. CC/1/2020
( Date of Filing : 10 Jan 2020 )
 
1. Philomina sebastian
Thannippara House, Angaleya Language Training Centre, Thumkuzhi Building Opposite of South Indian Bank, Kanjirappally
Kottayam
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Benny Joseph
Arakaprarambil, parathode P.O, Pallipadi, Kanjirappally
Kottayam
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Bindhu R MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Siby Mathew, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 09 Mar 2021
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM

Dated this the 9th day of March, 2021

 

Present:  Sri. Manulal V.S. President

Smt.  Bindhu R,  Member

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member

 

C C No. 01/2020 (filed on 10/01/2020)

 

Petitioner                                          :         Philomina Sebastian,

                                                                   W/o. Sebastian Antony,

                                                                   Thannippara House,

                                                                   Angaleya Language

Training Centre, Thumkuzhi

Building, Opst. South Indian bank,

         Kanjirappalli Thaluk, Kanjirappalli.

(Adv. Siby Mathew and

Adv. Sam Sunny)

                                                                             Vs.                            

Opposite Party                                 :         Benny Joseph,

                                                                   S/o. Joseph, Arakaparambil,

                                                                   Parathode P.O. Pallipadi,

                                                                   Kanjirappalli – 686512.

                                                                   (Adv. Anie Mathew)

 

                                                          O  R  D  E  R

Sri. Manulal V.S. President

          Complainant represented.  Counsel for the complainant submitted that the complainant is not pressing the complaint.  A not pressed memo is also filed by the counsel for the complainant.  Hence the complaint is disposed as not pressed.

          Pronounced in the Open Commission on this the 9th day of March, 2021.

Sri. Manulal V.S. President             Sd/-

Smt.  Bindhu R,  Member               Sd/-

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member                 Sd/-

                                                                                      By Order

                                                                           Senior Superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Bindhu R]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.