Heard petitioner in person. Petitioner had approached the respondent bank with a project plan to secure sanction of loan. Allegedly, the loan was not sanctioned by the respondent bank on untenable grounds. The petitioner states that he also approached Bank Lokpaal, but no order passed by Lokpaal is placed on record. Aggrieved petitioner took recourse to consumer grievance redressal agency filing a complaint before the District Forum. Though District Forum on some issues gave a finding preferable to the petitioner but eventually dismissed the complaint for that having been filed by the petitioner beyond the prescribed period of limitation. Aggrieved petitioner approached State Commission but for none appearance of the petitioner on the fixed date of hearing, the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. After the revision petition was filed before the National Commission, he was apprised to remove certain defects but that too remain uncomplied. The petitioner appears to have lost interest in the proceedings and that apart since the loan was not sanctioned, the petitioner had not become consumer of the respondent bank and to crown all after move of the petitioner did not find favour with the bank, complaint was filed not less than after five years of rejection of the application. That being so there being no merit, the revision petition is dismissed.