Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that despite attempts by the petitioners to obtain a legible copy of the insurance policy in question, it has not been possible to do so. He seeks to file copies of communication in that regard. The request is granted. Copies of communication may be taken on record. There is no appearance on behalf of the respondents despite issuance of notice on 06.09.2011, which were not received back. As 30 days had elapsed on the last date of hearing, the notices were deemed to have been served. This revision petition challenges the order dated 08.10.2009 of the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Mumbai (hereafter, he State Commission. By this order, the State Commission admitted the complaint filed by the petitioners only against O.P. No.1, namely, M/s Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co. Ltd. and came, rather peremptorily, to the conclusion that O.P. no.2, namely, Axis Bank Limited (Branch at Band Garden Road, Pune) was not a necessary party. This conclusion does not appear to be based on any discussion of evidence on record because it was made at the very admission stage. Clearly, this direction cannot be legally sustained. The order of the State Commission is thus set aside insofar as it relates to deletion of O.P. No.2-Axis Bank Limited from the complaint. The matter is remanded back to the State Commission for decision in accordance with law treating the complaint as being against both the Opposite Parties. The petitioners are directed to remain present before the State Commission on the date already fixed, i.e., 16.06.2012. Since the complaint is of 2009, we request the State Commission to decide the complaint as expeditiously as possible.