Yuvraj Singh Aulakh filed a consumer case on 09 Jul 2021 against Athelonics Gym in the DF-II Consumer Court. The case no is CC/527/2020 and the judgment uploaded on 15 Jul 2021.
Chandigarh
DF-II
CC/527/2020
Yuvraj Singh Aulakh - Complainant(s)
Versus
Athelonics Gym - Opp.Party(s)
Manjot Singh Rai Adv
09 Jul 2021
ORDER
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-II
U.T. CHANDIGARH
Consumer Complaint No.
:
527/ 2020
Date of Institution
:
12.10.2020
Date of Decision
:
09.07.2021
Yuvraj Singh Aulakh aged 28 years son of Harinder Singh Aulakh r/o H.No.320, Sector 35, Chandigarh.
... Complainant.
Versus
Athelonics Gym through its Owner/Manger, SCO 146-148, Sector 43, Chandigarh, email address: .
…. Opposite Party
BEFORE:
SHRI RAJAN DEWAN, PRESIDENT
SMT.PRITI MALHOTRA, MEMBER
SHRI B.M.SHARMA, MEMBER
Argued by
Sh.Manjot Singh Rai, Adv. for the complainant
OP exparte.
PER RAJAN DEWAN, PRESIDENT
By dint of this common order, we propose to dispose of the following five (5) connected consumer complaints in which common questions of law and fact are involved:-
1
2
3
4
Sr.
No.
C.C. No.
Parties Name
Amount deposited (In Rs.)
527/2020
Yuvraj Singh Aulakh Vs. Athelonics Gym
11,500/-
528/2020
Inderpal Singh Vs. Athelonics Gym
11,500/
532/2020
Gurjeet Singh Walia Vs. Athelonics Gym
11,500/
533/2020
Shavinder Kaur Sandhu Vs. Athelonics Gym
11,500/
534/2020
Manjot Singh Rai Vs. Athelonics Gym
11,500/
The facts are gathered from Consumer Complaint No.527/2020- Yuvraj Singh Aulakh Vs. Athelonics Gym.
The facts of the case as alleged by the complainant are that the OP is in the business of providing gym and related services. He subscribed for the membership of the OP-Gym for a period of one year, commencing from 29.01.2020 for an amount of Rs.12,500/-, which was paid in installments and cash as mutually agreed between the parties except Rs.1000/- as the same was to be paid after completion of three months of the membership. The confirmation of the receipt of the membership fee was given through SMS (Annexure C-1). The complainant was allotted membership No.4202. It has further been averred that he informed the OP many times that the equipment was faulty and some were not even working but the same were not got repaired/replaced. Subsequently, on 23.03.2020 due to wide spread pandemic of Covid-19, a nationwide lockdown was imposed and the gym remained closed till 04.08.2020. It has further been averred that when the gyms were opened, he went to the OP to inquire as to what adjustment was to be provided for which the gym remained closed then he was informed that they are discussing the matter with the management. On 12.08.2020, the OP informed the offer through SMS (Annexure C-2) in which the OP advertised that upon renewal of the membership 50% of the lockdown period was to be compensated meaning thereby that if the complainant renews his membership which had 6 months remaining at that time for another 12 months only then he was to get 2 months compensation of the period for which he was charged without providing any services. It has further been averred that in the last week of August, 2020 he again went to the OP to enquire about the period of 4 months for which the gym remained closed and he was informed that the same was to be deducted from their membership period. It has further been averred that the complainant informed the OP that he paid the huge amount of the membership fee out of his savings and he would be put to great loss if the same is not compensated but the OP repudiated his reasoning on the ground that they had to pay the rent of the showroom because of which they were entitled to charge fee of the services of four months for which they did not provide any facility and they told the complainant to take renewal offer to get 50% compensation. Finally, he got served a legal notice dated 24.09.2020 through his counsel upon the OP but to no effect. Alleging that the aforesaid acts of omission and commission on the part of the OP amount to deficiency in service and unfair trade practice, the complainant has filed the instant complaint.
Notice sent for the service of the Opposite Party through process server was received back with the report of refusal. Since refusal was good service, and none appeared on behalf of the Opposite Party on the date fixed, therefore vide order dated 07.06.2021, it was proceeded against exparte.
We have heard the learned Counsel for the complainant and have gone through the documents on record.
Admittedly, due to Covid-19 pandemic, the lockdown was enforced all over the country on the evening of 24.03.2020 by the Government of India as a preventive measure and to curb the spread of Corona virus due to which the gym of the OP remained closed till 04.08.2020 and even this fact has been admitted by the complainant in the complaint himself.
Needless to mention here that the country is still reeling under the threats of covid-19 pandemic and its spread has not yet been controlled, thereby causing threats to life due to which lockdowns of varying stringency have been placed by the UT/State Governments from time to time to curb the spread of Corona virus. Under these circumstances, it cannot be said that the OP has committed any sort of deficiency in service or indulged into unfair trade practice by not rendering the promised services to the complainant, during that period. As such, the complainant(s) is/are not entitled for refund of the membership fee as prayed for.
Further the complainant has not been able to place on record any documentary evidence in the shape of whatapps message/complaint/letter/email, if any, written to the OP to show that he ever made any complaint to the OP regarding the faulty equipments and, therefore, this plea of the complainant is rejected accordingly.
However, keeping in view the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case(s), we are of the considered view that the ends of justice would be met if the complaints are disposed of with a direction to the OP to render the services to the complainant(s) for the remaining period of 4 months as and when the restrictions imposed by the Government/Authorities are lifted and the gym of the OP become fully operational. We order accordingly.
In view of the above discussions, the complaints are disposed of as stated above with no order as to costs.
Certified copy of this order be communicated to the parties, free of charge. After compliance file be consigned to record room.
Announced
09.07.2021.
Sd/-
(RAJAN DEWAN)
PRESIDENT
Sd/-
(PRITI MALHOTRA)
MEMBER
Sd/-
(B.M.SHARMA)
MEMBER
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.