NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/4031/2009

SURYAKANT PRADHAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

ASST. PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER - Opp.Party(s)

IN PERSON

18 Jan 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 4031 OF 2009
(Against the Order dated 09/04/2009 in Appeal No. 229/2009 of the State Commission Orissa)
1. SURYAKANT PRADHANC/o Dharma Pradhan, At- khatiguda, P.O. Khatiguda, Nabarangpur ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. ASST. PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERBhavishyanidhi, Unit-IX, Bhubaneswar-Khurda ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.N.P. SINGH ,PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. S.K. NAIK ,MEMBER
For the Petitioner :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 18 Jan 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

No one appears for petitioner even on second call. It shows reluctance of petitioner to prosecute the proceeding. Revision petition in the circumstance is dismissed for default.


......................JB.N.P. SINGHPRESIDING MEMBER
......................S.K. NAIKMEMBER