Kerala

Ernakulam

CC/21/416

A.P RAJI - Complainant(s)

Versus

ASSET FINANCE. - Opp.Party(s)

16 Feb 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
ERNAKULAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/21/416
( Date of Filing : 11 Nov 2021 )
 
1. A.P RAJI
ATHANICKAL HOUSE PUTHENVEEDU PARAMBU, VANIAKKAD, THATHAPILLY P.O, NORTH PARAVUR.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. ASSET FINANCE.
PANAT SQUARE BUILDING, EDAPALLY
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. D.B BINU PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. RAMACHANDRAN .V MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. SREEVIDHIA T.N MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 16 Feb 2023
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ERNAKULAM

       Dated this the 16th day of January, 2023

                             Filed on: 11/11/2021

PRESENT

Shri.D.B.Binu                                                                          President

Shri.V.Ramachandran                                                              Member

Smt.Sreevidhia.T.N                                                                 Member                                                                  

CC NO.416/2021

Between

COMPLAINANT

A.P. Raji, S/o. A.S. purushothaman, Athanickal House, Puthanveedu Parambu, House No. 4/380, Vaniakkad, Thathappilly P.O., North Paravur, Pin 683520

 

VS

OPPOSITE PARTIES

1.     Manager, Asset Finance, Fortune Integrated Asset Finance Ltd., Panat Square Building, Edappally, Ernakulam 682024.

2.     Manager, Fortune Integrated Asset Finance Ltd., Naman Mid Town, A Wing, 21st Floor, Senapathi Bapat marg, Elfinston Road, Mumbai 400013.

(Rep. by Adv. Sabu S. (Kallaramoola), Indlaw Lawyers & Solicitors, 3rd Floor, Vallamattom Estate, Ravipuram, MG Road, Ernakulam 682015)

 

FINAL O R D E R

 

DB.Binu, President:

 

The complaint was filed under section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. The complainant is absent and has no representation from his side. . The opposite parties are also absent and have representation from their side. The case is posted for evidence of the complainant.

The complainant is continuously absent since 22-11-2021. Hence, the commission issued notice on 19.01.2023 to the complainant for appearance and to adduce evidence if any.

The notice sent to the complainant is seen as returned with an endorsement “unclaimed” as per the proof of the Postal Department.  The complainant failed to appear before the commission even today. The complainant is not interested to proceed further.   There is no scope in proceeding with the complaint.

Hence the complaint is closed as dismissed.

 

Pronounced in the open Commission on this the 16th day of January, 2023

 

Sd/-

                                                                             D.B.Binu, President

 

                                                                                         Sd/-

                                                                             V. Ramachandran, Member

 

                                                                                         Sd/-

Sreevidhia.T.N, Member         

Forwarded/by Order

 

 

Assistant Registrar

 

 

 

 

Despatch date:

By hand:     By post                                                  

kp/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CC No. 416/2021

Order Date: 16/02/2023

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. D.B BINU]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. RAMACHANDRAN .V]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SREEVIDHIA T.N]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.