
View 183 Cases Against Bharat Petroleum
BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION filed a consumer case on 04 May 2022 against ASHISH KAPOOR in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is RP/20/2022 and the judgment uploaded on 10 May 2022.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA
Revision Petition No.20 of 2022
Date of Institution:28.04.2022
Date of Decision:04.05.2022
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd, LPG Gas Plant, Lalru, District SAS Nagar, Mohali through its constituted attorney Sh.Sunil Kumar Brar working as Territory Manager
…..Petitioner
Versus
…..Respondents
CORAM: Mr.S.P.Sood, Judicial Member
Mr. Suresh Chander Kaushik, Member
Present:- Mr.Ashish Kapoor, Advocate for the petitioner.
ORDER
S P SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
Revision Petition is preferred against the order dated 15.12.2021 in Consumer Complaint No.273 of 2021 passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ambala vide which Opposite Party Nos.1 and 2 were proceeded ex parte.
2. The argument has been advanced by Mr.Ashish Kapoor, Advocate for the petitioner. With his kind assistance the original file including whatever the evidence has been led on behalf of revisionist had also been properly perused and examined.
3. While unfolding the arguments it has been argued by Mr.Ashish Kapoor, Advocate for the revisionist that wife of the complainant died due to burning of domestic gas, the complainant also informed to the OPNo.1 regarding the said incident. The petitioner deals with the Bharat Gas LPG agencies located in the state of Haryana. The summons received at the Lalru office of the petitioner were somehow inadvertently misplaced and could not be sent to the office of the petitioner at Hisar. It was only in March 2022, the counsel for the petitioners came to know about impugned order where petitioner had been proceeded against ex parte. The absence of the petitioner on 15.12.2021 was neither willful, nor intentional, but due to the facts and circumstances as explained above. The case was adjourned to 04.05.2022 for leading evidence of complainant. Learned counsel for the revisionist prayed that ex parte proceeding dated 15.12.2021 may be set setting aside qua petitioner.
4. In view of the above submissions and careful perusal of the entire record, it is true that ex parte proceeding was initiated against opposite party No.1, but, it is golden principle of law that proper opportunity should be afforded to the concerned party before deciding the case on merits. The complainant is not going to suffer any irreparable loss if the revisionist-O.P. No.1 is afforded an opportunity to defend itself before the learned District Commission, so in these circumstances, ex parte proceedings dated 15.12.2021 initiated against O.P. No.1-petitioner is set aside. Revision Petition is allowed qua petitioner. Let the petitioner be afforded an opportunity to file reply and lead evidence etc. thereafter the complaint be decided on merits.
5. The parties are directed to appear before the learned District Commission, Ambala on 18.05.2022 for further proceedings.
6. This revision petition has been disposed of without issuing notice to the respondents with a view to imparting substantive justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondents as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. In this regard, reliance can be placed on a Division Bench judgement of Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court rendered in Batala Machine Tools Workshop Cooperative Versus Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Gurdaspur (CWP No.9563 of 2002) decided on June 27, 2002.
7. Copy of this order be sent to the District Commission, Ambala.
04th May, 2022 Suresh Chander Kaushik S. P. Sood Member Judicial Member
S.K
(Pvt. Secy.)
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.