Date of filing:      14.05.2019 
                                                                                                                   Date of disposal: 28.02.2023

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVALLUR

 BEFORE  TMT. Dr.S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L, Ph.D (Law)                  .…. PRESIDENT
                 THIRU.P.MURUGAN,M.Com.ICWA(Inter),B.L.,                                       ....MEMBER-II

RBT/CC. No.92/2022
THIS TUESDAY, THE 28th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023
(CC.No.85/2019 sent from DCDRC, Chennai North)

M/s.S.B.R.O.Tapes private Limited,
Rep. by its Managing Director Mr.Shubham Maheswari,
S/o.Manojkumar Maheswari,
No.47/1, Vaidyanatha Mudali Street,
Tondaiyarpet, Chennai 600 081.                                                     ……Complainant.     
                                                                          //Vs//
1.Asha Enterprises,
   Rep. by its Proprietor,
   No.217/234, Thambu Chetty Street, Chennai 600 001.

2.Aquatech Tank – Carries Pipes and Tubes Private Limited,
    Rep. by its Managing Director,
    No.1/73, 150 feet, Agaram Main Road,
    Puthur, Tiruvanchery,
    Tambaram, Chennai 600 126.

3.Aquatech Water Tank Limited,
    Rep. by its Managing Director,
    No.89/120, Sidco Industrial Estate,
    Malumichampatti P.O.,
    Coimbatore District, Tamil Nadu.                                         .......Opposite parties. 
                         
This complaint has been filed before DCDRC, Chennai (North) as CC.No.85/2019 and transferred to this commission by the order of the Hon’ble State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai and taken on file as CC.No.92/2022.             
  The complaint was filed by the complainant under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 alleging deficiency in service against the opposite parties in selling defective product along with a prayer to direct the opposite parties to replace the defective products and to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- towards compensation for the mental agony and hardship caused to the complainant and to pay a sum of Rs.20,000/- for deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. 
No representation for complainant inspite of service of notice and informed through Commission. Written Arguments not filed. Sufficient opportunities given to the complainant for filing written arguments  and for appearance on 31.10.2022, 08.11.2022, 15.11.2022, 28.11.2022, 13.12.2022, 26.12.2022, 10.01.2023, 30.01.2023, 14.02.2023  and on 28.02.2023. In spite of the same, complainant failed to appear and prosecute the case. Hence, this commission is of the view that no purpose in keeping the complaint on file.  Hence the consumer complaint is dismissed for non prosecution.  No cost.
This order was pronounced by us in the open Commission on this 28th February 2023. 

  Sd/-                                                                                                                  Sd/-

MEMBER-II                                                                                                  PRESIDENT