
View 226 Cases Against Ansal Lotus
Dr. Yuti Mukesh Mishra filed a consumer case on 12 Nov 2013 against Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd. in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is CC/45/2013 and the judgment uploaded on 30 Nov -0001.
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
1. 2. VERSUS 1. 2.
BEFORE: JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.), PRESIDENT Argued by:Sh.Ravinder Pal Singh, Advocate for the complainants. Sh. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate the Opposite Parties. PER DEV RAJ, MEMBER The Orchard County, project of the Opposite Parties in Sector 115, Kharar-Landran Road, Mohali. It was stated that they applied for the said flat vide their application form on 16.11.2010 and deposited 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. The Opposite Parties are, jointly and severally, directed to refund the amount of Rs.42,92,650/-, to the complainants, alongwith interest @10% per annum, from the within two months, from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The Opposite parties are further, jointly and severally, directed to pay compensation, in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- for causing mental agony and physical harassment, to the complainants, within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited (HDFC) shall have the first charge on the amount to be refunded, to the complainants by the Opposite Parties, to the extent, the amount is due to it, against the complainants as it (HDFC) advanced loan in their (complainants) favour for part payment of the price of flat, in question, under the Tripartite Agreement dated 18.02.2012 (Annexure C-10). The Opposite Parties are further, jointly and severally, directed to pay cost of litigation, to the tune of Rs.10,000/-, to the complainants. In case the payment of amounts, mentioned in Clauses (i) and (ii), is not made, within the stipulated period, then the Opposite parties shall be liable to pay the amount mentioned in Clause (i) with interest @12% P.A., instead of 10% P.A., from the respective dates of deposits till realization and interest @12% P.A., on the 18. 19. Pronounced. 12th November, 2013. Sd/- [JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.)] PRESIDENT Sd/- [DEV RAJ] MEMBER AdSTATE COMMISSION(Consumer Complaint No.45 of 2013) Argued by:Sh.Ravinder Pal Singh, Adv. for the complainants. Sh.Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv. for the OPs. Dated the 12th day of November, 2013 ORDER
Ad
| |||||||||||||||
| [HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER] | |||||||||||||||
| PRESIDENT | |||||||||||||||
| [HON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ] | |||||||||||||||
| MEMBER |
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.