Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/317/2016

K M Babu - Complainant(s)

Versus

Anoop M J - Opp.Party(s)

P K Biju

16 May 2017

ORDER

C.D.R.F. Kasaragod
Kerala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/317/2016
 
1. K M Babu
S/o Mathew, R/at Koovellur House Thayeni Po , Cherupuzha via Cherupuzha Village Vellarikundu Thaluk
kasaragod
kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Anoop M J
Mekkara Fish Farm Dream City complex Pattikadu P O Peachi Road Junction Thekumpadi pin 680652
Thrisur
kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. P.RAMADEVI PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Shiba.M.Samuel MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 16 May 2017
Final Order / Judgement

Date of filing        :     20-12-2016

 Date of order      :     16-05-2017

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES  REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

                                            CC.317/16

                      Dated this, the  16th  day of  May   2017

 

PRESENT:

SMT.P.RAMADEVI                                         : PRESIDENT

SMT.SHIBA.M.SAMUEL                               : MEMBER

 

K.M.Babu, S/o. Mathew,                                         : Complainant

R/at Koovellur House,  Tayeni .Po.

Vellarikundu Taluk, Kasaragod.Dt. 670511

(Adv. P.K. Biju, Hosdurg)

 

Anoop. M.J,                                                               : Opposite party

Mekkara Fish Farm, Dream City Complex,

Pattikkadu.Po. Peachi Road Junction,

Thekumpadi, Thrissur Dt. 680652

(Exparte)

 

                                                            O R D E R

SMT.P.RAMADEVI, PRESIDENT

 

            Brief facts of the complaint are as follows:

            That the complainant is an agriculturist by profession and he has landed properties with facilities of fish farming for his own purpose and as a hobby and he already cultivating fishes in his own ponds.  The opposite party is the owner of Mekkara Fish Farm.  The complainant has contacted the opposite party on 25-09-2016 through phone by seeing the advertisement given by the opposite party “ Karshaka shree” magazine and ordered to make home delivery of young fishes of Annabaus 200 in numbers and Avoliy 20 in number of 15 Kg of fish feeding for his own acqua cultivation and the opposite party asked to send the amount of Rs.3245/- including delivery charges and the complainant sent the amount through DD to his account at Federal bank Pattikadu Branch. Opposite party agreed  to home delivery.  But the opposite party failed to deliver the item ordered and then the complainant informed opposite party his willingness to collect the ordered item from the opposite party’s farm at Thrissur. But at last opposite party agreed to repay the amount received from complainant’s bank account.  Bu believing the words of the opposite party, complainant sent his bank account number and details to opposite party on 7-10-2016.  But no payment was made by opposite party.  Thereafter the complainant sent a registered notice to opposite party asking for payment of the amount already received by opposite party and  compensation for mental agony and sufferings.  But the notice returned unserved with an endorsement unclaimed.  Hence the complaint.

2.         On admission of the complaint on file the Forum issued notice to opposite party. Opposite party duly served the notice but did not turned up.  Name of opposite party called absent, set exparte.

3.         Complainant filed  proof affidavit and Exts A1 to A3 were marked. Heard the counsel for complainant and documents perused.

4.         The specific case of the complainant is that opposite party has failed to deliver the order placed by the complainant and thereby made breach of contract.  Here the opposite party already received the amount from the complainant. On going through the  documents filed by the complainant it is clear that the complainant ordered the item on seeing the advertisement of opposite party.  Ext.A1 shows  the payment made by opposite party.  Ext.A3 is the copy of advertisement.  Ext.A2 is the registered demand  notice.  On going the entire facts of the case and on perusal of the documents it is clear that the  opposite party failed to perform his part of contract.  He fails to deliver the goods after receiving the payment. Failure of delivery of goods on receiving the payment amounts to deficiency in service.  There is no contra evidence before the forum.  On going through the entire facts of the case we are of the view that the complainant is entitled for the relief as prayed for.

            Therefore the complaint is allowed directing the opposite party to refund Rs. 3245/- to complainant with 10% interest per annum from the date of complaint till payment and opposite party is further directed to pay Rs.3000/- towards compensation and Rs.2000/- as cost of the proceedings.  Time for compliance is 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of order.

 

MEMBER                                                                                                                             PRESIDENT

Exts.

A1. 28-9-2016 Bank receipt for an amount of Rs. 3245/-

A2. 24-10-2016 Copy of letter sent by complainant to OP.

A3 Copy of advertisement.

 

 

MEMBER                                                                                                                             PRESIDENT

Pj/

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. P.RAMADEVI]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Shiba.M.Samuel]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.