Punjab

Bhatinda

CC/08/243

Perminder Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Anoop Enterprises - Opp.Party(s)

Sh.N.P.Singh

16 Dec 2008

ORDER


District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bathinda (Punjab)
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Govt. House No. 16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence, Bathinda-151 001
consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/243

Perminder Singh		 ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Anoop Enterprises
Neuron Technologies
Hindtel Communication,
Nokia India Pvt Ltd. 		...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:


Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Statement of Sh. N.P Singh, counsel for the complainant(W.O.) ..... Opposite party No. 2 has delivered new mobile handset make Nokia model 3110 having IMEI No.356833024592960 with one year warranty to the complainant in lieu of old mobile handset which was purchased by him vide bill No.R-15165 dated 21.01.2008. Complainant does not want to proceed with this complaint and it may be dismissed as fully satisfied. RO&AC Member President, D.C.F 16.12.2008 Present : Sh.N.P Singh, counsel for the complainant Sh. G.S Bhasin counsel for opposite party No.1. Sh. Sukhdev Mittal, counsel for opposite party No.2. Sh. Mahesh Singla, Authorised resentative of opposite party No.3 Opposite party No. 1 already exparte File taken up in Lok Adalat. In view of the above statement made by the learned counsel for the complainant, complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. File be consigned. Member President, D.C.F