This order shall dispose of aforementioned revision petitions as the facts and point of law involved are the same.

-2-

          These revision petitions have been filed with a delay of 208 days which is over and above the statutory period of 90 days given for filing the revision petition.  Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 consumer foras are required to decide the case within 90 days in case no evidence is required to be taken and within 150 days in case evidence is required to be taken.  Delay of 208 days, which is over and above the statutory period given for filing the revision petition, cannot be condoned without showing sufficient cause.  We are not satisfied with the cause shown.   Petitioners have not attached any Medical Certificate in support of the averment made in the application for condoantion of delay that Sh. Harshad Trivedi, Advocate, whom they had approached, suffered from a paralytic stroke.  Petitioners have not mentioned the date on which they had approached Sh. Tripathi or the date he suffered the stroke.  Delay of 208 days, under the circumstances, cannot be condoned.  Application for condontion of delay is dismissed.  Consequently, revision petitions are dismissed as barred by time.

-3-

          At this stage, counsel for the petitioners states that they are prepared to comply with the order of the State Commission provided the respondents cooperates with them. 

            Counsel for the respondents has assured us that they would cooperate with the petitioners to enable them to get the Completion Certificate and Occupation Certificate.