Haryana

Karnal

CC/410/2020

Pawan Sharma - Complainant(s)

Versus

Amazon In - Opp.Party(s)

Mandeep Singh Rai

31 Oct 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.410 of 2020

                                                          Date of instt.07.10.2020

                                                          Date of Decision:31.10.2022

 

Pawan Sharma son of Sh. Ramji Dass resident of H.no.236 ward no.16 near KDM School Gharaunda, district Karnal.

...…Complainant

                                        Versus

  1. Amazon in (online shopping site), 26/1, Head Office Bridge Guteway 8th floor, 26/1 Dr. Raj Kumar road malleshwrm (W) banglore-560055 Karnatka.
  2. Darshita ashiyana private limited M/s Nahar logistic park pvt. Ltd., khewat no.79/8, 39/59, khasra no.306,348,305, 48 & 56 near katana sahib Gurudwara Ludhiana-141113, Punjab.

                        ....Opposite parties.

                                              

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Smt. Dr. Rekha Chaudhary……..Member.

 

Present:  None for the complainant.

                Sh. Dheeraj Sachdeva, counsel for the OP-1.

                 

                Today the case is fixed for notice to the OP-2 as well as consideration on the application for issuing direction to complainant for making necessary amendment. No anyone has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant. Notice could not be issued for want of copy of complaint. Position remained the same on the last six adjourned dates. Case called several times since morning. It is already 04:00 PM. It appears that complainant is no more interested to pursue his case. There is no justification to adjourn the case further for the same purpose as complaint pertains to year 2020.

                Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated:31.10.2022             

                           President,     

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

 

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary) 

  Member                Member         

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.