Haryana

Panipat

CC/224/2022

Ashish Chawla - Complainant(s)

Versus

AJIO - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Himanshu Mittal

02 Jan 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PANIPAT
 
Complaint Case No. CC/224/2022
( Date of Filing : 03 Aug 2022 )
 
1. Ashish Chawla
S/o Sh. Jeet Singh Chawla R/o 77/3, Mahajan Wali Gali, Panipat, UID No.9921 -3641-8659.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. AJIO
Head Office at 3rd Floor, Kavarana Building, Lokmanya Tilak Rd, Dhobi Talao, Lohar Chawl, Kalbadevi, Mumbai, Maharashtra, through its Chairman/ General Manager/ Autho Rep.
2. AJIO
Corporate Office at WJ88 P54, 29th Main Rd, Old Madiwala, Jay Bheema Nagar, 1st Stage, BTM 1st Stage, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560068, through its General Manager/ Autho. Rep.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Dr. R. K. Dogra PRESIDENT
  Dr. Rekha Chaudhary MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Shri Himanshu Mittan, Advocate for complainant.
......for the Complainant
 
Shri Ashok Kadian, Advocate for opposite parties.
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 02 Jan 2024
Final Order / Judgement

No evidence of complainant is present. A date is requested on behalf of the complainant, which is opposed. Heard. This case is continuing for evidence of the complainant from 12.11.2022 and today is last opportunity. No effort has been made by the complainant to produce the evidence. Moreso, the complainant has already availed seven effective opportunities including last opportunity. Hence, there are no sufficient grounds for adjourning this case for the purpose of the evidence of the complainant. Hence, the evidence of the complainant is hereby closed by order of this Commission.

 2.               This complaint has been filed against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite parties. In written statement, all the allegations have been denied by the opposite parties and dismissal of the complaint was prayed for.

3.                 As the complainant has come before this Commission for seeking relief, the onus was on the complainant to prove his case by adducing cogent and convincing evidence. Since the complainant has not produced any evidence on record despite several effective opportunities as stated above and hence, there is no iota of evidence on record to substantiate the allegations of the complaint. Hence, the present complaint is hereby dismissed in lacking of evidence. However, both the parties are left to bear their own costs.

4.                This order be communicated to the parties free of costs and file be consigned to the record-room. 

 
 
[ Dr. R. K. Dogra]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Dr. Rekha Chaudhary]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.