We have perused the order sought to be assailed in these proceedings, passed by the Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in F.A. No. 137 of 2006. The appeal before the State Commission was filed by none except the petitioner / complainant against the order dated 23.12.2005 passed by the District Consumer Forum, Mylapore, Chennai in O.P. No. 374 of 2004 thereby dismissing the complaint of the complainant alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party – Air Travel Enterprises India Ltd. and Emirates Airlines on account of their alleged failure to provide him a confirmed passage from Dubai to Chennai on 13.10.2003 against a return ticket which he has purchased. He having failed to avail the earlier confirmed return ticket on 04.10.2003 on account of non – receipt of visa, the Air India could also not accommodate the complainant because of non – availability of the seat and, therefore, the complainant travelled by buying a fresh ticket. Both the fora below have considered the respective pleas and the evidence and material brought on record and have returned the concurrent finding that the opposite parties could not be held guilty of any deficiency in service on the alleged premises. We have considered the matter and in our view also, the view taken by the fora below is based on the correct appreciation of the facts, circumstances and evidence and material brought on record. We do not see any illegality, material irregularities or jurisdictional error in the finding and order passed by the fora below. Revision petition being devoid of merits is hereby dismissed.