BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION OF TELANGANA (Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) AT HYDERABAD
EA NO. 13 OF 2016
IN
CC NO. 66 OF 2014
Between:
1) Chanakya Bandyopadhyay
S/o Dipankar Bandyopadhyay,
Aged about 37 years,
2) Manasi Bandyopadhyay
W/o Chanakya Bandyopadhyay,
Aged about 33 years,
Rep. by GPA Mr.Dipankar Bandyopadhyay,
R/o 311, Shanthi Kiran Apartments,
Indiranagar, Vijay Nagar Colony,
Masabtank, Hyderabad – 500 057.
…Petitioners/Complainants
And
1) M/s Aliens Developers (P) Ltd.,
Rep. by its Managing Director &
Joint Managing Director Mr.Hari Challa
S/o Mr.CVR Chowdhary &
Mr.C.Venkat Prasanna S/o CVR Chowdary
respectively, Flat No.910, Teja Block,
My Home Nawadweepa Apartments,
Near Hitech City, Madhapur,
Hyderabad – 500 081.
2) Hari Challa S/o CVR Chowdhary,
Managing Director, M/s Aliens Developers (P) Ltd.,
O/oFlat No.910, Teja Block,
My Home Nawadweepa Apartments,
Near Hitech City, Madhapur,
Hyderabad – 500 081.
3) C.Venkat Prasanna S/o CVR Chowdhary,
Joint Managing Director, M/s Aliens
Developers (P) Ltd., O/o Flat No.910, Teja Block,
My Home Nawadweepa Apartments,
Near Hitech City, Madhapur,
Hyderabad – 500 081.
(present address of respondents is at Aliens
Space Station, Tellapur Post,
Ramachandrapuram mandal,
Medak district, Hyderabad – 502 032).
…Respondents/Opposite parties
Counsel for Petitioners : Sri V.Appa Rao
Counsel for Respondents : Sri P.Raja Sripathi Rao
This is an application filed by the Petitioner under Section-27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying to initiate necessary proceedings against the Respondents/Opposite parties for non-compliance of the orders dated 29.04.2016 passed in CC No.66/2014 on the file of this Commission and punish them as per the provisions of Section-27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
QUORUM: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K. JAISWAL, PRESIDENT
And
SRI K.RAMESH, MEMBER.
Tuesday the Twentieth day of August
Two thousand eighteen
.
Oral Order : (Per Hon’ble Justice Sri M.S.K. Jaiswal, President).
***
On behalf of the Petitioner, it is submitted that the matter has been settled out of court and hence he is not pressing the EA. An endorsement to that effect is made by the counsel on behalf of the Petitioner. Hence, the execution application is dismissed accordingly.
PRESIDENT MEMBER
Dated 20.08.2018