Haryana

Karnal

CC/11/2015

Naveen Kashyap S/o Rattan Chand - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. M/s Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

28 Mar 2016

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.  

                                                          Complaint No. No.11 of 2015

                                                               Date of instt.: 16.1.2015

                                                          Date of decision: 28.03.2016

 

Naveen Kashyap son of Shri Rattan Chand Kashyap resident of old house no.RG-506,(New No.870), Gali No.1, Jundla Gate, Karnal.

.                                                                   ……..Complainant. .

                                      Vs.

1.M/s Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. registered office at 7th Floor and 8th Floor, FCI Tower,61, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 19, through its authorized signatory.

2.M/s Luxmi Agency, authorized service centre of Samsung India Electronics (Pvt.)Ltd. at near Dayal Singh College, Link road, Karnal through its authorized signatory.

                                                                           ……… Opposite Parties.

                     Complaint u/s 12  of the Consumer

                     Protection Act.

Before          Sh.K.C.Sharma……….President.                

                   Sh.Anil Sharma…….Member.

Present:-        Sh.Naveen Kashyap Advocate- complainant in person.

                    Sh.Dheeraj Sachdeva Advocate for the Opposite Party No.1.

                    Opposite Party no.2 ex parte.

ORDER:                   

                       

                        The learned counsel for the Opposite Party no.1 made statement that the Opposite Party no.1 is ready to pay Rs.4000/- to the  complainant within a period of thirty days subject to the condition that the complainant shall return the original job sheet to the Opposite Parties. Thereafter, complainant made  statement for withdrawal of the complaint by submitting that  he will return the original job sheet to the Opposite Parties today itself and that he does not want to pursue with the present complaint. Statements of both the parties have been reduced into writing separately.

 

 

 

 

 

2.                In view of that the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. The parties shall remain bound of the statements made by their counsel and comply accordingly. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced
dated:28.03.2016

                                                                    (K.C.Sharma)

                                                                   President,

                                                         District Consumer Disputes

                                                          Redressal Forum, Karnal.

            (Anil Sharma ) 

               Member.

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.