BEFORE THE CIRCUIT BENCH OF A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION: AT TIRUPATHI.

FA.No.357/2012 against C.C.No.91/2011 District Consumer Forum, Kadapa YSR District.

Between:

S.Jitender Kumar, S/o.Shankar Lal,

Aged about 41 years, Presently

Residing at D.No.18-430, B.K.M.Street,

Kadapa City, YSR Dist.

…Appellant/Complainant.

And

1.LIC of India,

2.LIC of India,

3.LIC of India,

…Respondents/Opp.Parties.

Counsel for the Appellant            

Counsel for the Respondents      

QUORUM: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI D.APPA RAO, PRESIDENT,

AND

SRI T. ASHOK KUMAR, HON’BLE MEMBER.

THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER,

TWO THOUSAND TWELVE.

Oral Order (Per Hon’ble Justice Sri D.Appa Rao, President)

*******

The complainant in proof of his case filed his affidavit evidence and 

A perusal of the same would disclose that there was an Annexure to the policy.      

Apart from it, the Photostat copy of the policy filed by the complainant shows that the Critical Illness Rider Benefit options are subjected to certain conditions mentioned in the Annexure.   

In the result, the appeal is dismissed.  

________________________

________________________

                                                                                   Vvr.