
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHANKAR DIVATE
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 528 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 05/11/2012 in Appeal No. 71/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan) WITH IA/934/20131. M/S. VRL LOGISTICS LTD.THROUGH THE LEGAL ADVISOR, GIRIRAJ, ANNEXE CIRCUIT HOU...
Case Number: 528
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2014
Hospital Transport VRL Logistics
Court Name: Solapur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Solapur.Complaint Case No. CC/10/4191. VRL Logistric Ltd,Deshmukh Transport Nagar,Near Pune Naka,Kondi village,Area Managar Mr.Keshav it iraskarDeshmukh Transport Nagar,Near Pune Naka,Kondi village,SolapurMaharashtra...........Complaina...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Raichur
Appelant Advocate Sri. C.K. Basavaraj Naik
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAICHUR, SATH KACHERI, D.C. OFFICE COMPOUND, RAICHUR-584101, KARNATAKA STATE.Ph.No. 08532-233006.Complaint Case No. CC/13/31. Sunil Kumar S/o. Bheemanna, RaichurOcc:Business, R/o. Near Maruthi Temple Huttk village, Tq. LingasugurRaichur...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S. J. KUMARESAN
Respondant Advocate MR.M. VENKATA RAMANA
First Appeal No. FA/786/2011(Arisen out of Order Dated 08/12/2010 in Case No. CC/51/2009 of District East Godwari-II at Rajahmundry)1. G. KALPANA, W/O MURALI, SRI BHAGYALAKSHMI SAINATH SILKS, R/O 4TH FLOOR, SIRIR APARTMENTS, 74-8/6/11, F-4, PRAKASH NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G. DIST.....
Case Number: 786
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RANVIR SINGH & MR. RAVI SHANKAR NANDA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2037 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 07/03/2011 in Appeal No. 18/2009 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)1. M/S. VRL LOGISTIC LTD. & ANR.No-675/9 Avinashi Road, R.G Puddur,ChinniampalayamCoimbatore-641...
Case Number: 2037
|
Date of Filing: 23-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2012
Court Name: Raichur
Appelant Advocate Sri. T. Keshavacharya
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/741. Shri. M. Pampapathi S/o. Sharabanna, RaichurAGe: 54 years, Occ: Manager, at Pragathi Grain Bank, Chandrabanda Branch, Tq. Dist: Raichur & R/o. H.No. 1-3-573/60, Officer's Colony Ashapur Road, RaichurRaichurKarnataka...........Complainant(s)Versus1. T...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate G.S.KALKURA
Respondant Advocate
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramRevision Petition No. RP/11/26(Arisen out of Order Dated 26/02/2011 in Case No. CC/10/166 of District Kasaragod)1. VRL LOGISTIC LTDTHALIKAVU ROADKANNURKERALA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. STIFY.K.X...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kolhapur
Appelant Advocate A.A.Bhumkar.
Respondant Advocate A.R.Kadam
monthly reportDistrict Consumer Forum, KolhapurComplaint Case No. CC/09/751 1. Kohinoor Tarpolin Indusstries.10/11/Y.P.Powarnagar.Kolhapur ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. VRL Logistics ltd.Carkithouse Road. Hubali.2. Branch Manager/Claim Officer, V.R.L. Logistics LtdVyapari peth...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Raichur
Appelant Advocate Sri. Gururaj Joshi
Respondant Advocate
Dist. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Sath Kacheri, Raichur.Dist. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Sath Kacheri, Raichur.Execution Application(EA) No. EA/10/38 M/s. R.K. Enterprises, Represented by its Manager, Sri Gurunath Raibag, Lingasugur ...........Appellant(s)Vs.The Ma...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 15-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Raichur
Appelant Advocate Sri. Gururaj Joshi
Respondant Advocate
Dist. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Sath Kacheri, Raichur.Dist. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Sath Kacheri, Raichur.consumer case(CC) No. CC/10/54 M/s. R.K. Enterprises, Represented by its Manager, Sri Gurunath Raibag, Lingasugur ...........Appellant(s)Vs.The Manager, V...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against VRL Logistics in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against VRL Logistics ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against VRL Logistics under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.