
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
PRESENT: NONE FOR COMPLAINANTNONE WAS PRESENT ON 04.07.2022 AND 20.08.2022 AND EVEN TODAY. COURT NOTICE WAS ISSUED TO THE COMPLAINANT WHICH STAND SERVED. IT SEEMS THAT COMPLAINANT IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING HIS MATTER. ACCORDINGLY, THE COMPLAINT OF THE COMPLAINANT IS DISMI...
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2020
|
Date of Upload: 07-11-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S R.Das & Assctes
Respondant Advocate
None appears for the parties.This is a matter of 2019.It appears that appellant is remaining absent on more occasions and he is not interested to proceed with the appeal.Therefore the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution....
Case Number: 121
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S R.Das & Asscets
Respondant Advocate
None appears for the parties.This is a matter of 2019.It appears that appellant is remaining absent on more occasions and he is not interested to proceed with the appeal.Therefore the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution....
Case Number: 122
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S R.Das & Assoc.
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONODISHA, CUTTACKFirst Appeal No. A/107/2019( Date of Filing : 01 May 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 01/02/2019 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/10/2018 of District Malkangiri)1. Regional Manager, Vivo OfficeOffice No-12, Bhaban...
Case Number: 107
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 10-10-2022
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Ashwani Phogat
Respondant Advocate Sh. Amit Kumar Chaudhary
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/18/600( Date of Filing : 06 Dec 2018 )1. SatishS/o Sh. Jainarayan VPO Brahmanwas, Basantpur District Rohtak. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Vivo Service CenterVivo Service Center SCF 23,1st F...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 06-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 29-04-2022
Court Name: Barnala
Appelant Advocate Jagsir Singh Dhaliwal
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/124/2021( Date of Filing : 04 Jun 2021 )1. Khushpreet Singhaged about 17 years minor S/o Harpal Singh R/o Chahal Patti Village badra Tehsil Tapa under the guardianship of her mother Sawarnjit Kaur W/o Harpal SinghBarnalaPunjab...........Compl...
Case Number: 124
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2021
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2022
Court Name: Azamgarh
Appelant Advocate HARENDRA NATH YADAV
Respondant Advocate
जिला उपभोक्ता विवाद प्रतितोष आयोग- आजमगढ़।परिवाद संख्या 119 सन् 2018प्रस्तुति दिनांक 11.10.2018 न�...
Case Number: 119
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-01-2022
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. S.K. Hooda
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/20/493( Date of Filing : 27 Oct 2020 )1. Hitesh YadavS/o Sh. Gopal Yadav At Present R/o H.No. 1584/1, Rajindra Colony, Bhiwani Chungi, Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Vivo Mobile Co.,Of...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 27-10-2020
|
Date of Upload: 24-11-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate JOYJIT DUTTA
Respondant Advocate
SILIGURI CIRCUIT BENCHofWEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION2nd MILE, SEVOKE ROAD, SILIGURIJALPAIGURI - 734001Revision Petition No. RP/3/2020( Date of Filing : 25 Feb 2020 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. CC/38/2018 of District Uttar Dinajpur)1. VIVO CO...
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2020
|
Date of Upload: 18-03-2021
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Dalbir Singh
Respondant Advocate Sh. Amit Kumar Chaudhary
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. 513/2018( Date of Filing : 22 Oct 2018 )1. Sumit SinghS/o Sh. Dalbir Singh R/o B-232, Preet Vihar Colony, Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Vivo Mobile India Private LimitedTEC 1 and TEC 2, ...
Case Number: 513
|
Date of Filing: 22-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 12-02-2021
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vivo in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vivo ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Vivo under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.