company-name-logo

Vidyut


Latest Judgments

Total 3633 Consumer Court Cases Against Vidyut.

Uttar Pradesh

Executive Engineer, Vidyut Vitran Khand V/S Rajendra Prasad Shukla

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Ashok Kumar Shukla Adv.

Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Adv.

Case Number: 52

|

Date of Filing: 04-02-1994

|

Date of Upload: 10-12-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Executive Engineer, Vidyut Vitran Khand V/S Guru Dayal

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 303

|

Date of Filing: 18-08-1994

|

Date of Upload: 19-12-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Chairman, Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parshad V/S Kamlesh Prasad Pandey

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Ashok Kumar Jaiswal Adv.

Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Adv.

Case Number: 377

|

Date of Filing: 23-09-1994

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2022

Uttar Pradesh

President , Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad V/S Smt. Anita

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Jagdish Prasad Adv.

Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Adv.

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/389/1994( Date of Filing : 03 Oct 1994 )1. Smt. Anita Lok Nagar, Unnao ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. President , Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad Unnao ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. S.K PANDEY PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. RAM SHA...

Case Number: 389

|

Date of Filing: 03-10-1994

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Chairman, Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad V/S Dhaniram

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Shri Jagdish Prasad Adv.

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 47

|

Date of Filing: 11-01-1995

|

Date of Upload: 07-12-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Chairman , Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad V/S Smt. Radha Devi

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 54

|

Date of Filing: 04-02-1994

|

Date of Upload: 19-12-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Executive Engineer, Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad V/S Ram Kumar

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Arvind Kumar Shukla Adv.

Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Adv.

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/152/1994( Date of Filing : 25 Apr 1994 )1. Ram Kumar Vill Purwa, Unnao ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Executive Engineer, Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad Unnao ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. S.K PANDEY PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR....

Case Number: 152

|

Date of Filing: 25-04-1994

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad V/S Abdul Rab

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/219/1994( Date of Filing : 20 Jun 1994 )1. Abdul Rab Vill Binda Nagar, Shukla Ganj, Unnao ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad Unnao............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. S.K PANDEY PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. R...

Case Number: 219

|

Date of Filing: 20-06-1994

|

Date of Upload: 19-12-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Executive Engineer, Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad V/S Vinay Kumar Pandey

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/28/1994( Date of Filing : 20 Jan 1994 )1. Vinay Kumar Pandey 154 Gandhi Nagar, Unnao ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Executive Engineer, Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad Unnao ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. S.K PANDEY PRESID...

Case Number: 28

|

Date of Filing: 20-01-1994

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Executive Engineer, Vidyut Vibhag V/S Brujkant

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/42/1994( Date of Filing : 31 Jan 1994 )1. Brujkant 56/61 Adarsh Nagar, Unnao ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Executive Engineer, Vidyut Vibhag Unnao............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. S.K PANDEY PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. RAM SHANKAR TRIP...

Case Number: 42

|

Date of Filing: 31-01-1994

|

Date of Upload: 20-12-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vidyut in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vidyut ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Vidyut under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.