Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA MADAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2196 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 05/02/2010 in Appeal No. 286/2004 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JODHPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Executive Engineer (O & M), Raisnghnagar, RatangarhChuruRajas...
Case Number: 2196
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. NANDWANI & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. K. VIJANANI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 494 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 26/10/2009 in Appeal No. 734/2008 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through Sh. Raj Singh Yadav, Executive Engineer (CD), J.V.V.N.L...
Case Number: 494
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH CHADHA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3279 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 09/08/2010 in Appeal No. 1622/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GAUPAL PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.NW-83, Swamibagh DayalbaghAgraUttar Pradesh...........Petitione...
Case Number: 3279
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2010
Court Name: Beed
Appelant Advocate P.R. Choure
Respondant Advocate U.D.Chapalgaonkar
Complaint Case No. CC/10/161. Smt. Kawita urf Trishala Pandurang MarkandeR/o.Juna Nagar Naka,Beed,Tq.& Dist.BeedBeedMaharashtra............Complainant(s)Versus1. Chif Engineer Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd.Beed & Other-02Jalna Road,Beed,Tq.& Dist.BeedBeedMaharashtr...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Beed
Appelant Advocate S.S.Deshmukh.
Respondant Advocate A.S.Patil.
Complaint Case No. CC/10/541. Ramrao Anandrao SheteR/o.Sait.Namdevnagar,Dhanora Road,Beed,Tq.& Dist.BeedBeedMaharashtra............Complainant(s)Versus1. Sahayak Abhiyanta/Up Abhiyanta,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd.Up Vibhag,BeedMalives,Beed,Tq.& Dist.BeedBeedMahar...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. NANDWANI & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2014 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 18/02/2010 in Appeal No. 1129/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through Ashok Kumar Gupta, Executive Engineer (CD), J.V.V.N.L...
Case Number: 2014
|
Date of Filing: 17-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 26-11-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAKESH AGARWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3799 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 05/07/2010 in Appeal No. 2144/2006 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR HOT BREADSC-76, Sarojini Marg, C SchemeJaipurRajasthan...........Petitioner(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 3799
|
Date of Filing: 08-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.N. BOHRA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2138 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 12/03/2010 in Appeal No. 103/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JODHPUR VIDYUT VIRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND OTHERSChairman Cum Managing Director Jodhpur Vidhyut V...
Case Number: 2138
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 15-11-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MANU MRIDUL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3192 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 10/02/2010 in Appeal No. 842/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through Assistant Engineer, Amet, Tehsil-AmetRajsamandRajasthan...
Case Number: 3192
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 11-11-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. NANDWANI & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2570 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 22/04/2010 in Appeal No. 233/2004 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through Shushil Kumar, Executive Engineer (DD-I), AVVNLBhilwara...
Case Number: 2570
|
Date of Filing: 15-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 10-11-2010
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vidyut in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vidyut ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Vidyut under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.