Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. NANDWANI & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2004 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 07/03/2011 in Appeal No. 2016/2008 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR.JYOITI NAGAR, JAIPURRAJASTHAN2. ASSITANT ENGINEER DIST...
Case Number: 2004
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 21-07-2011
Court Name: Beed
Appelant Advocate N.M.Kulkarni/Latpate.
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/10/1671. Babsaheb Bhanudas Bangar.R/o.Matkuli,Tq.Ashti,Dist.BeedBeedMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Karyakari Abhiyanta,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut VitaranCompany Ltd. BeedBeed,Tq.& Dist.BeedBeedMaharashtra.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. NANDWANI & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2399 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 03/02/2010 in Appeal No. 228/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through SH. Mohammed Saleem Executive Engineer (O & M), A.V.V.N...
Case Number: 2399
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 04-05-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 287 OF 19991. PRINCE COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DELHI VIDYUT BOARD & LTD ...........Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. K. BATTA, PRESIDING MEMBERHO...
Case Number: 287
|
Date of Filing: 08-10-1999
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2011
Court Name: Beed
Appelant Advocate B.B.Gite
Respondant Advocate S.V.Shinde
Complaint Case No. CC/10/1271. Kalawati Gangadhar/Haridas GadadeR/o.Vidyanagar (west),Barshi Road,Beed.BeedMaharashtra............Complainant(s)Versus1. Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd.BeedMarfat :- Up-Abhiyanta.Malives,BeedBeedMaharashtra.............Opp.Party(s) BE...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 30-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. NANDWANI & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 879 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 24/01/2011 in Appeal No. 16/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through B.L. Pacherwal, Executive Engineer (O&M), J.V.V.N.L.Band...
Case Number: 879
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 14-06-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3262 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 29/07/2010 in Appeal No. 1706/2009 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. PRAMOD KUMAR SAHUMahajan Studio, Infront of Distt. Hospital, ChhatarpurChhatarpurMadhya...
Case Number: 3262
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. JITENDRA MITRUCKA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 617 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 15/07/2010 in Appeal No. 653/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAM PRATAP & ANR.R/o. Near Ranthambore Circle, Near New Grain MandiSawai MadhopurRajasthan2. M...
Case Number: 617
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2011
Vidyut Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITIYA MADAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 157 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 20/10/2010 in Appeal No. 283/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITEDThrough The Executive Engineer (O&M)DhaulpurRajasthan..........
Case Number: 157
|
Date of Filing: 14-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 20-04-2011
Court Name: Beed
Appelant Advocate s.m.geete
Respondant Advocate s.n.tandale
Complaint Case No. CC/10/1321. Shaikh Chand Pasha TamboliR/o.Shirsala,Tq.Parali (Vai),Dist.BeedBeedMaharashtra............Complainant(s)Versus1. Dy.Exective Engineer,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd.ParaliM.S.E.D.Co.Parali (Vai),Dist.BeedBeedMaharashtra.............Op...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vidyut in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vidyut ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Vidyut under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.