
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. B. N. Sarmah
Respondant Advocate Mr. K. Sekhose
This appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 12/03/2007, passed by learned District Consumer Forum, Dimapur in C.F.D Case No 2/2003.By this impugned judgment the Forum has awarded compensation of Rs.61,460/- to the complainant-respondent for the loss of personal b...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 23-05-2007
|
Date of Upload: 14-06-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Asha Chaudhary
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2010/555(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Union Of India a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Surendra Prasad a...........Respond...
Case Number: 2010
|
Date of Filing: 31-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 04-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dr U V Singh
Respondant Advocate S K Verma
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2002/2318(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Union of Indiaa...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Dr D P Tayala.........
Case Number: 2002
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2002
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.S. Bhadoria
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RAJASTHAN,JAIPUR BENCH NO.1COMPLAINT CASE NO: 32/2016Ex.Hav. /APTC Harpal Singh Yadav r/o Yadav Krishi Farm, 60 feet Road, PO Tulia Distt. Alwar.Vs.Union of India through the Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Defence, N...
Case Number: 32
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-05-2016
Court Name: Sirsa
Appelant Advocate DS Smagh
Respondant Advocate HS Raghav
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 194/121. Jagwant SinghVillage Kurangawali Disst sirsaSirsaHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Union of India JaipurJaipur Rajsthan............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Sh S.B Lohia PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Rajiv Mehta MEMBER For the Compl...
Case Number: 194
|
Date of Filing: 20-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Anand Mohan
Respondant Advocate Sri S K Srivastava
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. C/2009/971. Deepak Srivastavaa...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Union Of India Railwaysa............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Udai Shanker A...
Case Number: 2009
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sunil K. Sahore
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:109 of 2016Date of Institution:05.04.2016Date of Decision:07.04.2016Union of India through the Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Railway, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi.Station Master, New Delhi Railway S...
Case Number: 109
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 11-04-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dr. Uday Veer Singh
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1995/1616(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Union Of Indiaa...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Kampuri Devia.........
Case Number: 1995
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-1995
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vishal Chaudhary
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1998/3105(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Union of Indiaa...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Sri Badri Prasada.....
Case Number: 1998
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-1998
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2016
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Charan singh Virk
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/15/681. Swami Vidya Nand jichela swami Ganesha nand Giri, shiv shakti ashram himalyan colony Haripur Haridwar...........Complain...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 05-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-04-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Union Of India in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Union Of India ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Union Of India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.