company-name-logo

Telecom

Latest Judgments

Total 3921 Consumer Court Cases Against Telecom.

Uttar Pradesh

PRIDE TELECOM V/S GIRRAJ

Telecom  

Court Name: Agra-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM-ICOURT CLUB, CIVIL COURT COMPOUNDAGRA, UTTAR PRADESHExecution Application No. EX 05/2012InCCN 238/20101. GIRRAJMP NAGAR,AGRA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. PRIDE TELECOM1 NEHERU NAGAR,AGRA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. UMESH ...

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 03-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 21-09-2017

Haryana

Gurlove Telecom V/S Sanjeev

Telecom  

Court Name: Kaithal

Appelant Advocate Sh.R.K.Sharma

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 174/171. Sanjeev Amargarh Gamri,Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Gurlove TelecomKaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Jagmal Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh MEMBERHON'BLE MS. Harisha MEMBER For the Complainant:Sh.R.K...

Case Number: 174

|

Date of Filing: 03-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 03-10-2017

Haryana

ADARSH TELECOM V/S HITESH CHUGH

Telecom  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SHARAD AGGARWAL

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 840 of 2016Date of Institution: 15.09.2016Date of Decision : 18.09.2017Hitesh Chugh son of Sh. Om Parkash, resident of House No.945/8, Sanoli Road, Panipat. Appellant-ComplainantVersus1. Adarsh Tel...

Case Number: 840

|

Date of Filing: 15-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 21-11-2017

Uttar Pradesh

Maruti Telecom Centre V/S Anil Kumar

Maruti   Telecom  

Court Name: Lucknow-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/1058/20111. Anil KumarLDA Colony Lucknow...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Maruti Telecom CentreParag Dairy Lucknow............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. ARVIND KUMAR PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. SMT SNEH TRIPATHI MEMBER For the Complainant:For ...

Case Number: 1058

|

Date of Filing: 11-11-2011

|

Date of Upload: 24-10-2017

Punjab

Mahluxmi Telecom V/S Jaswinder Singh

Telecom  

Court Name: Faridkot

Appelant Advocate Ashu Mittal

Respondant Advocate

Judgment OrderFinal OrderComplaint Case No. CC/17/2251. Jaswinder Singh S/o Darshan Singh r/o Village Malooka Tehsil Bathinda BathindaPUNJAB...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Mahluxmi TelecomNew Market Near Ram Leela Ground Jaitu through its Proprietor.FARIDKOTPUNJAB............Op...

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 14-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 22-11-2017

West Bengal

The Telecom District Manager,BSNL V/S Anup Kumar Salui

Telecom  

Court Name: Bankura

Appelant Advocate Self

Respondant Advocate

BANKURA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKUCHKUCHIA ROAD, SUREKA BHAWANBANKURA-722 101, WEST BENGALOFFICE-03242-255792Complaint Case No. CC/68/2015( Date of Filing : 05 Jun 2015 )1. Anup Kumar SaluiVill-Madhabpur,P.O,P.S-Beliatore, Dist-BankuraBankuraWest Bengal............

Case Number: 68

|

Date of Filing: 05-06-2015

|

Date of Upload: 05-09-2018

West Bengal

Shyam Telecom and another V/S Sri Tanmay Chowdhury

Telecom  

Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/271/20151. Sri Tanmay ChowdhuryAlipore Central Jail Quarter (No. 3), 17, Judges Court Road, Kolkata - 700027. ...........Comp...

Case Number: 271

|

Date of Filing: 26-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 12-09-2017

Haryana

Dashmesh Jee Telecom V/S Satish Kumar

Telecom  

Court Name: Kaithal

Appelant Advocate Sh.Sandeep Rana

Respondant Advocate Sh.Sunil.Dhull

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 25/171. Satish Kumar Sisla Sismor.Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Dashmesh Jee TelecomDelhi............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MS. Harisha MEMBER For the Complainant:Sh.Sandeep Rana, Advocate...

Case Number: 25

|

Date of Filing: 16-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 19-09-2017

Punjab

Nanda Telecom V/S Sukhwinder Singh Maan

Telecom  

Court Name: Moga

Appelant Advocate In person

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX,ROOM NOS. B209-B214, BEAS BLOCK, MOGAComplaint Case No. CC/17/671. Sukhwinder Singh Maans/o Sh. Kartar Singh r/o vill. Sangatpura Teh. Bagha Purana, Distt, Moga.MogaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1....

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 11-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 12-12-2017

West Bengal

Proprietor MS National Telecom V/S Sunanda Dey

Telecom  

Court Name: Nadia

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMNADIA170,DON BOSCO ROAD, AUSTIN MEMORIAL BUILDING.NADIA, KRISHNAGARExecution Application No. EA/13/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/133/20151. Sunanda DeyW/o Tapan Dey Vill Tantipara P O Krishnagar P S KotwaliNadiaWest Bengal...........Appella...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 29-03-2016

|

Date of Upload: 01-09-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Telecom in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Telecom ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Telecom under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.