Techno
Latest Judgments
Total 384 Consumer Court Cases Against Techno.
M/S SNG VARDHMAN TECHNO BUILD PVT. LTD. V/S MR. JAGBIR SINGH KESAR & ANR.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI (Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Arguments: 26.04.17 Date of decision: 03.05.17Complaint No. 1155/2015In the matter of:1. Mr. Jagbir Singh Kesar S/o Mr. Dasaandhi Ram Aged about 72 years R/o House No. 1...
Case Number: 1155
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
M/S. Machino Techno Sales Ltd. V/S Saikat Chatterjee
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/14/7781. Saikat ChatterjeeFlat 5C, Biswarup Housing Society, 1, Dwarika Nath Ghosh Lane, P.S. - Chetla, Kolkata - 700027. ......
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2017
TECHNO GUIDE V/S NEELAM BAGWANI
Court Name: Jaipur-II
Appelant Advocate Pramod Kumar
Respondant Advocate Suresh Sharma
Case Number: 1813
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 03-03-2017
Manager, Mobile Techno Zone, Authorised Service Centre V/S Dilwar Hussain Barbhuiya
Court Name: Cachar
Appelant Advocate Complainant Self
Respondant Advocate Shamshuj Zaman Mazumder
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/21/20161. Dilwar Hussain BarbhuiyaVill & P/O- Gossaipur Pt- III, P/S- Udharbond, CacharCacharAssam...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Manager, Mobile Techno Zone, Authorised Service CentreBordan Complex, Gopalganj, Silchar.CacharAssam.............
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-02-2017
M/S ACTIVE TECHNO CARE V/S DEEPAK SHARMA
Court Name: Indore-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 184
|
Date of Filing: 14-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2018
THE ASSISTANT ELECTRICAL ENGINEER V/S M/S. VIJAY COASTAL TECHNO LINKS
Court Name: West Godavari
Appelant Advocate G.Ronald Raju
Respondant Advocate S.Brahmam
Case Number: 24
|
Date of Filing: 25-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Proprietor Techno Computers V/S Mr. Deepak
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate Harish Kumar
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/302/20161. Mr. DeepakAged about 29 years S/o Seetharam B.M Hill, Bolwar Puttur Kasaba Village Puttur Taluk D.K. Dakshina KannadaKarnataka...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Proprietor Techno ComputersG 2 Meridian Guru Plaza, Near Bata Showroom,...
Case Number: 302
|
Date of Filing: 25-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-02-2017
M/S. Techno Culture Building Centre Pvt. Ltd. V/S Amar Nath Bhattacharjee
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate Raja Ram Sinha
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/391/20161. Amar Nath Bhattacharjee12 No. Plot, Haludboni Main Road, Parsudiah, Jamshedpur, P.S. Parsudiah, Pin-831002, State-Jharkhand....
Case Number: 391
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-01-2017
TECHNO ELECTRONICS V/S PURNIMA MONDAL
Court Name: Nadia
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMNADIA170,DON BOSCO ROAD, AUSTIN MEMORIAL BUILDING.NADIA, KRISHNAGARComplaint Case No. CC/110/20161. PURNIMA MONDALNISHIKANTA MONDAL PALPARA MORE KRISHNAGARNADIAWEST BENGAL...........Complainant(s)Versus1. TECHNO ELECTRONICSSUJIT KUNDU ROA...
Case Number: 110
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2016
M/S SOUTHERN TECHNO VETURES V/S shahul hameed
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate V.S.VINEETH KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CC.26/11JUDGMENT DATED:22.12.2016PRESENT : JUSTICE SHRI. P.Q. BARKATHALI : PRESIDENTSHRI.V.V. JOSE : MEMBERShahul Hameed,S/o Mahamood, Sabir Manzil,Pezhummood, Kuttichal P.O,Thiruvananthapuram. :...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Techno in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Techno ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Techno under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.