
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC/41/2018 Present:- Sh. Amit Joshi, Counsel for the Complainant .It is stated on behalf of complainant that he wants to withdraw the present complaint on the ground that this Forum does not have Pecuniary Jurisdiction to entertain this complaint, in the light...
Case Number: 41
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments:09.07.2018Date of Decision:11.07.2018 FIRST APPEAL NO.383/2015In the matter of:M/s. TDI Infrastructure Ltd.,Through its authorised representative,9-Kasturba Gandhi Mar...
Case Number: 383
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate TARJIT SINGH CHHIKARA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA First appeal No.1621 of 2017Date of the Institution:14.12.2017Date of Decision: 29.05.2018Ramphal S/o Sh.Tek Ram, R/o S-1/902, TDI Kingsbury Flats, Kundli, Sonepat. .….AppellantVersus1. TDI Infrastructure Ltd....
Case Number: 1621
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAVI SHANKAR GARG
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 1129 of 2017Date of Institution: 20.09.2017Date of Decision : 14.05.2018Raj Kumar son of late Sh. J.K. Lal, resident of House No.541, Faiz Bazar, Sonepat, Haryana. Appellant-ComplainantVersusM/s TDI...
Case Number: 1129
|
Date of Filing: 20-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SANDEEP SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Hearing: 10.05.2018 Date of decision:14.05.2018Complaint No.1090/2016IN THE MATTER OF:Smt. Davinder KaurR/o 178, Sector-3, Type III,Sadiq Nagar,New Delhi-110049Sh. Charanjit Si...
Case Number: 1090
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SKV ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate M/S. GURUJI LEGAL SERVICES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 760 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 09/02/2015 in Complaint No. 320/2012 of the State Commission Delhi)1. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & 2 ORS.9, Kasturba Gandhi Marg,NEW DELHI-2. SH. D.N. TANEJA (CHAIRMAN)TDI I...
Case Number: 760
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. KANIKA AGNIHOTRI & MR. VAIBHAV AGNIHOTRI
Respondant Advocate MR. RAVI PANWAR, MR. D.P. CHATURVEDI & MR. N.P.S. PANWAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2340 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 28/10/2013 in Appeal No. 625/2013 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTTD.9 KASTURBA GANHI MARG, CANNUGHT PLACE, NEW DELHI...........Petitio...
Case Number: 2340
|
Date of Filing: 23-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2018
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case No.CC-5/2016 Dated: 17/04/2018 The OP has moved an application for dismissal of complaint on the ground of Pecuniary Jurisdiction, stating that the cost of the flat/plot exceeds Rs. 20 Lacs i.e. Rs. 24,56,818/-, as suc...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-04-2018
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case No.CC- 68/2017 Dated: 17/04/2018 The OP has moved an application for dismissal of complaint on the ground of Pecuniary Jurisdiction, stating that the cost of the flat exceeds Rs. 20 Lacs i.e. Rs. 35,88,318/-, as such, this Forum does not have Pecuniary Jurisdiction to en...
Case Number: 68
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-10-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SKV ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1539 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 12/08/2016 in Complaint No. 225/2015 of the State Commission Delhi)1. M/S. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, 9, KASTURBA GANDHI MARG,NEW...
Case Number: 1539
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Tdi Infrastructure in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Tdi Infrastructure ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Tdi Infrastructure under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.