
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate V.K. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Hearing:20.09.2019 Date of decision:26.09.2019Complaint No.294/2019Complaint No.295/2019IN THE MATTER OFC-294/2019Smt. Sarika Gupta, W/o Late Sh. Rajeev Gupta,R/o E-383, Secon...
Case Number: 295
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2019
|
Date of Upload: 30-09-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate V.K. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Hearing:20.09.2019 Date of decision:26.09.2019Complaint No.294/2019Complaint No.295/2019IN THE MATTER OFC-294/2019Smt. Sarika Gupta, W/o Late Sh. Rajeev Gupta,R/o E-383, Secon...
Case Number: 294
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2019
|
Date of Upload: 30-09-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate D P KAUSHIK
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments :16.09.2019Date of Decision :23.09.2019 COMPLAINT NO 973/2016In the matter of:1. Mrs. Ajita Bishnoi W/O Mr. Tejasvi Bishnoi Resident of A-1/245. IInd Floor, Safdarjung...
Case Number: 973
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-10-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments :06.09.2019Date of Decision : 17.09.2019 COMPLAINT NO 225/2015In the matter of:1. Dr. Kulvinder Singh Bahl R/o C-8, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi-110076 ……&he...
Case Number: 225
|
Date of Filing: 04-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2019
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN,I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC.569/2015 Dated: In the matter of: Sh. Satish Kumar…ComplainantVersusTDI Infrastructure...
Case Number: 569
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 09-09-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAKESH NUNIWAL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No.404 of 2019 Date of the Institution: 25.04.2019 Date of Decision: 23.07.2019Navin Chhikara son of Shri Ranbir Singh, permanent resident of Village Juan, Tehsil and District Sonepat, at present resid...
Case Number: 404
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2019
|
Date of Upload: 09-08-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PUNEET BHATNAGAR
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments : 17.07.2019Date of Decision :22.07.2019 COMPLAINT NO.672/2018 In the matter of:Sandeep Kumar,S/o. Late Shri Dhan Raj Prasad,R/o. A-1/69, Sector-3,Rohini, Delhi-110085...
Case Number: 672
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NEERAJ GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint Case No.501 of 2018Date of the Institution:29.08.2018Date of Decision:02.07.2019Durga Sharma W/o Sh. Brij Bhushan R/o House No.11/80, Chint Puri Colony, Sonepat, (Haryana). .….ComplainantVersusM/s TD...
Case Number: 501
|
Date of Filing: 31-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 23-07-2019
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN,I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC.2038/2011 Dated: In the matter of: Mrs. Anjali Bansal…ComplainantVersusTDI Infrastructure Ltd.… Opposite PartyARUN KUMAR ...
Case Number: 2038
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 17-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate BHAG SINGH
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint No.276 of 2017Date of the Institution:08.05.2017Date of Decision: 29.05.2019Brijender Singh Malik s/o Sh. Sh.Ishwar Singh R/o H.No. 13-D, Pancham Nagar, Sonepat (Haryana). .….ComplainantVersusThe Man...
Case Number: 276
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 02-07-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Tdi Infrastructure in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Tdi Infrastructure ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Tdi Infrastructure under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.